From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] slab, rcu: move TINY_RCU variant of kvfree_rcu() to SLAB
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 10:28:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250203-slub-tiny-kfree_rcu-v1-1-d4428bf9a8a1@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250203-slub-tiny-kfree_rcu-v1-0-d4428bf9a8a1@suse.cz>
Following the move of TREE_RCU implementation, let's move also the
TINY_RCU one for consistency and subsequent refactoring.
For simplicity, remove the separate inline __kvfree_call_rcu() as
TINY_RCU is not meant for high-performance hardware anyway.
Declare kvfree_call_rcu() in rcupdate.h to avoid header dependency
issues.
Also move the kvfree_rcu_barrier() declaration to slab.h
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 5 +++++
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 36 ------------------------------------
include/linux/rcutree.h | 3 ---
include/linux/slab.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
kernel/rcu/tiny.c | 11 -----------
mm/slab_common.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 48e5c03df1dd83c246a61d0fcc8aa638adcd7654..3f70d1c8144426f40553c8c589f07097ece8a706 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -1082,6 +1082,11 @@ static inline notrace void rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(void)
#define kfree_rcu_mightsleep(ptr) kvfree_rcu_arg_1(ptr)
#define kvfree_rcu_mightsleep(ptr) kvfree_rcu_arg_1(ptr)
+/*
+ * In mm/slab_common.c, no suitable header to include here.
+ */
+void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr);
+
#define kvfree_rcu_arg_2(ptr, rhf) \
do { \
typeof (ptr) ___p = (ptr); \
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index fe42315f667fc5be7f2ed8eae6ea0c7193030846..f519cd6802286710bdd56588b5ff3d07bcd30b92 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -90,41 +90,6 @@ static inline void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
synchronize_rcu();
}
-/*
- * Add one more declaration of kvfree() here. It is
- * not so straight forward to just include <linux/mm.h>
- * where it is defined due to getting many compile
- * errors caused by that include.
- */
-extern void kvfree(const void *addr);
-
-static inline void __kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
-{
- if (head) {
- call_rcu(head, (rcu_callback_t) ((void *) head - ptr));
- return;
- }
-
- // kvfree_rcu(one_arg) call.
- might_sleep();
- synchronize_rcu();
- kvfree(ptr);
-}
-
-static inline void kvfree_rcu_barrier(void)
-{
- rcu_barrier();
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC
-void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr);
-#else
-static inline void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
-{
- __kvfree_call_rcu(head, ptr);
-}
-#endif
-
void rcu_qs(void);
static inline void rcu_softirq_qs(void)
@@ -164,7 +129,6 @@ static inline void rcu_end_inkernel_boot(void) { }
static inline bool rcu_inkernel_boot_has_ended(void) { return true; }
static inline bool rcu_is_watching(void) { return true; }
static inline void rcu_momentary_eqs(void) { }
-static inline void kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void) { }
/* Avoid RCU read-side critical sections leaking across. */
static inline void rcu_all_qs(void) { barrier(); }
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 27d86d9127817e50f8d4dd79e1990d70a02435bb..dbe77b5fe06ec89a393b5444d6c479ced346a37b 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -34,12 +34,9 @@ static inline void rcu_virt_note_context_switch(void)
}
void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void);
-void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr);
-void kvfree_rcu_barrier(void);
void rcu_barrier(void);
void rcu_momentary_eqs(void);
-void kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void);
struct rcu_gp_oldstate {
unsigned long rgos_norm;
diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
index 09eedaecf1205672bb2e7c8cd57ae8fccebc2737..bcc62e5656c35c6a3f4caf26fb33d7447dead39a 100644
--- a/include/linux/slab.h
+++ b/include/linux/slab.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include <linux/overflow.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/percpu-refcount.h>
#include <linux/cleanup.h>
@@ -1082,6 +1083,19 @@ extern void kvfree_sensitive(const void *addr, size_t len);
unsigned int kmem_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s);
+#ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
+static inline void kvfree_rcu_barrier(void)
+{
+ rcu_barrier();
+}
+
+static inline void kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void) { }
+#else
+void kvfree_rcu_barrier(void);
+
+void kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void);
+#endif
+
/**
* kmalloc_size_roundup - Report allocation bucket size for the given size
*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
index 4b3f319114650d372d490919669a2a9e248e731d..0ec27093d0e14a4b1060ea08932c4ac13f9b0f26 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
@@ -246,17 +246,6 @@ bool poll_state_synchronize_rcu(unsigned long oldstate)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(poll_state_synchronize_rcu);
-#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC
-void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
-{
- if (head)
- kasan_record_aux_stack(ptr);
-
- __kvfree_call_rcu(head, ptr);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvfree_call_rcu);
-#endif
-
void __init rcu_init(void)
{
open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks);
diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index 4030907b6b7d89adcf62c70e82e95c8deb41adba..81a0ce77b11c2ef8db9164cdca5853069402f161 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -1284,6 +1284,25 @@ EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_alloc);
EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(kfree);
EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_free);
+#ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
+
+void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
+{
+ if (head) {
+ kasan_record_aux_stack(ptr);
+ call_rcu(head, (rcu_callback_t) ((void *) head - ptr));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // kvfree_rcu(one_arg) call.
+ might_sleep();
+ synchronize_rcu();
+ kvfree(ptr);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvfree_call_rcu);
+
+#endif
+
/*
* This rcu parameter is runtime-read-only. It reflects
* a minimum allowed number of objects which can be cached
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-03 9:28 [PATCH 0/4] slab, rcu: move and consolidate TINY_RCU " Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-03 9:28 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-02-04 9:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] slab, rcu: move TINY_RCU variant of " Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03 9:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] rcu: remove trace_rcu_kvfree_callback Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05 9:28 ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03 9:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] rcu, slab: use a regular callback function for kvfree_rcu Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05 9:13 ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03 9:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] slab: don't batch kvfree_rcu() with SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05 9:40 ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03 19:07 ` [PATCH 0/4] slab, rcu: move and consolidate TINY_RCU kvfree_rcu() to SLAB Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-04 10:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-04 11:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05 9:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250203-slub-tiny-kfree_rcu-v1-1-d4428bf9a8a1@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox