linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kent.overstreet@linux.dev, vbabka@suse.cz, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	 peterz@infradead.org, yuzhao@google.com, minchan@google.com,
	 shakeel.butt@linux.dev, souravpanda@google.com,
	pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,  00107082@163.com,
	quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com, surenb@google.com,
	 linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] alloc_tag: uninline code gated by mem_alloc_profiling_key in page allocator
Date: Sat,  1 Feb 2025 15:18:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250201231803.2661189-3-surenb@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250201231803.2661189-1-surenb@google.com>

When a sizable code section is protected by a disabled static key, that
code gets into the instruction cache even though it's not executed and
consumes the cache, increasing cache misses. This can be remedied by
moving such code into a separate uninlined function.
On a Pixel6 phone, page allocation profiling overhead measured with
CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING=y and profiling disabled is:

             baseline             modified
Big core     4.93%                1.53%
Medium core  4.39%                1.41%
Little core  1.02%                0.36%

This improvement comes at the expense of the configuration when profiling
gets enabled, since there is now an additional function call. The overhead
from this additional call on Pixel6 is:

Big core     0.24%
Middle core  0.63%
Little core  1.1%

However this is negligible when compared with the overall overhead of the
memory allocation profiling when it is enabled.
On x86 this patch does not make noticeable difference because the overhead
with mem_alloc_profiling_key disabled is much lower (under 1%) to start
with, so any improvement is less visible and hard to distinguish from the
noise. The overhead from additional call when profiling is enabled is also
within noise levels.

Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
---
Changes since v1 [1]:
- Removed inline_if_mem_alloc_prof and uninlined the gated code
unconditionally, per Steven Rostedt and Vlastimil Babka
- Updated changelog to include overhead when profiling is enabled

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250126070206.381302-3-surenb@google.com/

 include/linux/pgalloc_tag.h | 60 +++-------------------------
 mm/page_alloc.c             | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/pgalloc_tag.h b/include/linux/pgalloc_tag.h
index 4a82b6b4820e..c74077977830 100644
--- a/include/linux/pgalloc_tag.h
+++ b/include/linux/pgalloc_tag.h
@@ -162,47 +162,13 @@ static inline void update_page_tag_ref(union pgtag_ref_handle handle, union code
 	}
 }
 
-static inline void clear_page_tag_ref(struct page *page)
-{
-	if (mem_alloc_profiling_enabled()) {
-		union pgtag_ref_handle handle;
-		union codetag_ref ref;
-
-		if (get_page_tag_ref(page, &ref, &handle)) {
-			set_codetag_empty(&ref);
-			update_page_tag_ref(handle, &ref);
-			put_page_tag_ref(handle);
-		}
-	}
-}
-
-static inline void pgalloc_tag_add(struct page *page, struct task_struct *task,
-				   unsigned int nr)
-{
-	if (mem_alloc_profiling_enabled()) {
-		union pgtag_ref_handle handle;
-		union codetag_ref ref;
-
-		if (get_page_tag_ref(page, &ref, &handle)) {
-			alloc_tag_add(&ref, task->alloc_tag, PAGE_SIZE * nr);
-			update_page_tag_ref(handle, &ref);
-			put_page_tag_ref(handle);
-		}
-	}
-}
+/* Should be called only if mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() */
+void __clear_page_tag_ref(struct page *page);
 
-static inline void pgalloc_tag_sub(struct page *page, unsigned int nr)
+static inline void clear_page_tag_ref(struct page *page)
 {
-	if (mem_alloc_profiling_enabled()) {
-		union pgtag_ref_handle handle;
-		union codetag_ref ref;
-
-		if (get_page_tag_ref(page, &ref, &handle)) {
-			alloc_tag_sub(&ref, PAGE_SIZE * nr);
-			update_page_tag_ref(handle, &ref);
-			put_page_tag_ref(handle);
-		}
-	}
+	if (mem_alloc_profiling_enabled())
+		__clear_page_tag_ref(page);
 }
 
 /* Should be called only if mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() */
@@ -222,18 +188,6 @@ static inline struct alloc_tag *__pgalloc_tag_get(struct page *page)
 	return tag;
 }
 
-static inline void pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int nr)
-{
-	struct alloc_tag *tag;
-
-	if (!mem_alloc_profiling_enabled())
-		return;
-
-	tag = __pgalloc_tag_get(page);
-	if (tag)
-		this_cpu_sub(tag->counters->bytes, PAGE_SIZE * nr);
-}
-
 void pgalloc_tag_split(struct folio *folio, int old_order, int new_order);
 void pgalloc_tag_swap(struct folio *new, struct folio *old);
 
@@ -242,10 +196,6 @@ void __init alloc_tag_sec_init(void);
 #else /* CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING */
 
 static inline void clear_page_tag_ref(struct page *page) {}
-static inline void pgalloc_tag_add(struct page *page, struct task_struct *task,
-				   unsigned int nr) {}
-static inline void pgalloc_tag_sub(struct page *page, unsigned int nr) {}
-static inline void pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int nr) {}
 static inline void alloc_tag_sec_init(void) {}
 static inline void pgalloc_tag_split(struct folio *folio, int old_order, int new_order) {}
 static inline void pgalloc_tag_swap(struct folio *new, struct folio *old) {}
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index b7e3b45183ed..16dfcf7ade74 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1041,6 +1041,84 @@ static void kernel_init_pages(struct page *page, int numpages)
 	kasan_enable_current();
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING
+
+/* Should be called only if mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() */
+void __clear_page_tag_ref(struct page *page)
+{
+	union pgtag_ref_handle handle;
+	union codetag_ref ref;
+
+	if (get_page_tag_ref(page, &ref, &handle)) {
+		set_codetag_empty(&ref);
+		update_page_tag_ref(handle, &ref);
+		put_page_tag_ref(handle);
+	}
+}
+
+/* Should be called only if mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() */
+static noinline
+void __pgalloc_tag_add(struct page *page, struct task_struct *task,
+		       unsigned int nr)
+{
+	union pgtag_ref_handle handle;
+	union codetag_ref ref;
+
+	if (get_page_tag_ref(page, &ref, &handle)) {
+		alloc_tag_add(&ref, task->alloc_tag, PAGE_SIZE * nr);
+		update_page_tag_ref(handle, &ref);
+		put_page_tag_ref(handle);
+	}
+}
+
+static inline void pgalloc_tag_add(struct page *page, struct task_struct *task,
+				   unsigned int nr)
+{
+	if (mem_alloc_profiling_enabled())
+		__pgalloc_tag_add(page, task, nr);
+}
+
+/* Should be called only if mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() */
+static noinline
+void __pgalloc_tag_sub(struct page *page, unsigned int nr)
+{
+	union pgtag_ref_handle handle;
+	union codetag_ref ref;
+
+	if (get_page_tag_ref(page, &ref, &handle)) {
+		alloc_tag_sub(&ref, PAGE_SIZE * nr);
+		update_page_tag_ref(handle, &ref);
+		put_page_tag_ref(handle);
+	}
+}
+
+static inline void pgalloc_tag_sub(struct page *page, unsigned int nr)
+{
+	if (mem_alloc_profiling_enabled())
+		__pgalloc_tag_sub(page, nr);
+}
+
+static inline void pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int nr)
+{
+	struct alloc_tag *tag;
+
+	if (!mem_alloc_profiling_enabled())
+		return;
+
+	tag = __pgalloc_tag_get(page);
+	if (tag)
+		this_cpu_sub(tag->counters->bytes, PAGE_SIZE * nr);
+}
+
+#else /* CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING */
+
+static inline void pgalloc_tag_add(struct page *page, struct task_struct *task,
+				   unsigned int nr) {}
+static inline void pgalloc_tag_sub(struct page *page, unsigned int nr) {}
+static inline void pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int nr) {}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING */
+
 __always_inline bool free_pages_prepare(struct page *page,
 			unsigned int order)
 {
-- 
2.48.1.362.g079036d154-goog



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-01 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-01 23:18 [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: avoid extra mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() checks Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-02-01 23:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] alloc_tag: uninline code gated by mem_alloc_profiling_key in slab allocator Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-02-03  8:23   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-04  0:32   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-01 23:18 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
2025-02-04  0:46   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] alloc_tag: uninline code gated by mem_alloc_profiling_key in page allocator Shakeel Butt
2025-02-04 18:14     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-02-03 20:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: avoid extra mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() checks Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250201231803.2661189-3-surenb@google.com \
    --to=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=00107082@163.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@google.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=souravpanda@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox