linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, brauner@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] pid: drop irq disablement around pidmap_lock
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 18:42:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250201174203.GA26042@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250201163106.28912-7-mjguzik@gmail.com>

I'll try to review on Monday, but I see nothing obviously wrong after
a very quick glance. Although I am not sure 4/6 is really useful, but
I won't argue.

However, shouldn't this patch also remove the comment which explains
the possible lock inversion? Above put_pid(),

	/*
	 * Note: disable interrupts while the pidmap_lock is held as an
	 * interrupt might come in and do read_lock(&tasklist_lock).
	 *
	 * If we don't disable interrupts there is a nasty deadlock between
	 * detach_pid()->free_pid() and another cpu that does
	 * spin_lock(&pidmap_lock) followed by an interrupt routine that does
	 * read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
	 *
	 * After we clean up the tasklist_lock and know there are no
	 * irq handlers that take it we can leave the interrupts enabled.
	 * For now it is easier to be safe than to prove it can't happen.
	 */

Oleg.

On 02/01, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> It no longer serves any purpose now that the tasklist_lock ->
> pidmap_lock ordering got eliminated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/pid.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
> index 73625f28c166..900193de4232 100644
> --- a/kernel/pid.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> @@ -115,11 +115,10 @@ static void delayed_put_pid(struct rcu_head *rhp)
>  void free_pid(struct pid *pid)
>  {
>  	int i;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_not_held(&tasklist_lock);
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&pidmap_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock(&pidmap_lock);
>  	for (i = 0; i <= pid->level; i++) {
>  		struct upid *upid = pid->numbers + i;
>  		struct pid_namespace *ns = upid->ns;
> @@ -142,7 +141,7 @@ void free_pid(struct pid *pid)
>  		idr_remove(&ns->idr, upid->nr);
>  	}
>  	pidfs_remove_pid(pid);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pidmap_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock(&pidmap_lock);
>  
>  	call_rcu(&pid->rcu, delayed_put_pid);
>  }
> @@ -210,7 +209,7 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns, pid_t *set_tid,
>  		}
>  
>  		idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> -		spin_lock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
> +		spin_lock(&pidmap_lock);
>  
>  		if (tid) {
>  			nr = idr_alloc(&tmp->idr, NULL, tid,
> @@ -237,7 +236,7 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns, pid_t *set_tid,
>  			nr = idr_alloc_cyclic(&tmp->idr, NULL, pid_min,
>  					      pid_max, GFP_ATOMIC);
>  		}
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
> +		spin_unlock(&pidmap_lock);
>  		idr_preload_end();
>  
>  		if (nr < 0) {
> @@ -271,7 +270,7 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns, pid_t *set_tid,
>  
>  	upid = pid->numbers + ns->level;
>  	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> -	spin_lock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
> +	spin_lock(&pidmap_lock);
>  	if (!(ns->pid_allocated & PIDNS_ADDING))
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	pidfs_add_pid(pid);
> @@ -280,18 +279,18 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns, pid_t *set_tid,
>  		idr_replace(&upid->ns->idr, pid, upid->nr);
>  		upid->ns->pid_allocated++;
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&pidmap_lock);
>  	idr_preload_end();
>  
>  	return pid;
>  
>  out_unlock:
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&pidmap_lock);
>  	idr_preload_end();
>  	put_pid_ns(ns);
>  
>  out_free:
> -	spin_lock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
> +	spin_lock(&pidmap_lock);
>  	while (++i <= ns->level) {
>  		upid = pid->numbers + i;
>  		idr_remove(&upid->ns->idr, upid->nr);
> @@ -301,7 +300,7 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns, pid_t *set_tid,
>  	if (ns->pid_allocated == PIDNS_ADDING)
>  		idr_set_cursor(&ns->idr, 0);
>  
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&pidmap_lock);
>  
>  	kmem_cache_free(ns->pid_cachep, pid);
>  	return ERR_PTR(retval);
> @@ -309,9 +308,9 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns, pid_t *set_tid,
>  
>  void disable_pid_allocation(struct pid_namespace *ns)
>  {
> -	spin_lock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
> +	spin_lock(&pidmap_lock);
>  	ns->pid_allocated &= ~PIDNS_ADDING;
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&pidmap_lock);
>  }
>  
>  struct pid *find_pid_ns(int nr, struct pid_namespace *ns)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-01 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-01 16:31 [PATCH v3 0/6] reduce tasklist_lock hold time on exit and do some Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-01 16:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] exit: perform add_device_randomness() without tasklist_lock Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 17:51   ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-03 17:55     ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-01 16:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] exit: hoist get_pid() in release_task() outside of tasklist_lock Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 19:27   ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-03 19:35     ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 20:13       ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-03 20:22         ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 20:28           ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-04  1:51           ` Andrew Morton
2025-02-01 16:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] exit: postpone tty_kref_put() until after tasklist_lock is dropped Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 18:06   ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-03 19:33     ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-04 11:22       ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-04 12:12         ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-01 16:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] pid: sprinkle tasklist_lock asserts Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-01 16:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] pid: perform free_pid() calls outside of tasklist_lock Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 18:49   ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-03 19:31     ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 20:02       ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-01 16:31 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] pid: drop irq disablement around pidmap_lock Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-01 17:42   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-02-01 17:45     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-01 18:19   ` David Laight
2025-02-01 18:42     ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-01 21:51       ` David Laight
2025-02-01 22:00         ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-02 13:55           ` David Laight
2025-02-02 19:34             ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-02 20:44               ` David Laight
2025-02-02 22:06                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-03 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] reduce tasklist_lock hold time on exit and do some Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250201174203.GA26042@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox