From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com, oleg@redhat.com
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] exit: postpone tty_kref_put() until after tasklist_lock is dropped
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 17:31:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250201163106.28912-4-mjguzik@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250201163106.28912-1-mjguzik@gmail.com>
Instead of smuggling the tty pointer directly, use a struct so that more
things can be added later.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---
kernel/exit.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 257dd8ed45ea..d2c74f93f7d2 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -122,6 +122,13 @@ static __init int kernel_exit_sysfs_init(void)
late_initcall(kernel_exit_sysfs_init);
#endif
+/*
+ * For things release_task() would like to do *after* tasklist_lock is released.
+ */
+struct release_task_post {
+ struct tty_struct *tty;
+};
+
static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead)
{
nr_threads--;
@@ -141,12 +148,11 @@ static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead)
/*
* This function expects the tasklist_lock write-locked.
*/
-static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static void __exit_signal(struct release_task_post *post, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
struct signal_struct *sig = tsk->signal;
bool group_dead = thread_group_leader(tsk);
struct sighand_struct *sighand;
- struct tty_struct *tty;
u64 utime, stime;
sighand = rcu_dereference_check(tsk->sighand,
@@ -160,7 +166,7 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
#endif
if (group_dead) {
- tty = sig->tty;
+ post->tty = sig->tty;
sig->tty = NULL;
} else {
/*
@@ -207,10 +213,8 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
__cleanup_sighand(sighand);
clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SIGPENDING);
- if (group_dead) {
+ if (group_dead)
flush_sigqueue(&sig->shared_pending);
- tty_kref_put(tty);
- }
}
static void delayed_put_task_struct(struct rcu_head *rhp)
@@ -236,10 +240,13 @@ void __weak release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task)
void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
{
+ struct release_task_post post;
struct task_struct *leader;
struct pid *thread_pid;
int zap_leader;
repeat:
+ memset(&post, 0, sizeof(post));
+
/* don't need to get the RCU readlock here - the process is dead and
* can't be modifying its own credentials. But shut RCU-lockdep up */
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -252,7 +259,7 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
ptrace_release_task(p);
- __exit_signal(p);
+ __exit_signal(&post, p);
/*
* If we are the last non-leader member of the thread
@@ -280,6 +287,7 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
sizeof(unsigned long long));
release_thread(p);
put_task_struct_rcu_user(p);
+ tty_kref_put(post.tty);
p = leader;
if (unlikely(zap_leader))
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-01 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-01 16:31 [PATCH v3 0/6] reduce tasklist_lock hold time on exit and do some Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-01 16:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] exit: perform add_device_randomness() without tasklist_lock Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 17:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-03 17:55 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-01 16:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] exit: hoist get_pid() in release_task() outside of tasklist_lock Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 19:27 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-03 19:35 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 20:13 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-03 20:22 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 20:28 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-04 1:51 ` Andrew Morton
2025-02-01 16:31 ` Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2025-02-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] exit: postpone tty_kref_put() until after tasklist_lock is dropped Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-03 19:33 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-04 11:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-04 12:12 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-01 16:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] pid: sprinkle tasklist_lock asserts Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-01 16:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] pid: perform free_pid() calls outside of tasklist_lock Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 18:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-03 19:31 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-03 20:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-01 16:31 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] pid: drop irq disablement around pidmap_lock Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-01 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-01 17:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-01 18:19 ` David Laight
2025-02-01 18:42 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-01 21:51 ` David Laight
2025-02-01 22:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-02 13:55 ` David Laight
2025-02-02 19:34 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-02 20:44 ` David Laight
2025-02-02 22:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-03 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] reduce tasklist_lock hold time on exit and do some Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250201163106.28912-4-mjguzik@gmail.com \
--to=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox