From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Subject: [PATCH] block: Skip the folio lock if the folio is already dirty
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 22:51:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250124225104.326613-1-willy@infradead.org> (raw)
Postgres sees significant contention on the hashed folio waitqueue lock
when performing direct I/O to 1GB hugetlb pages. This is because we
mark the destination pages as dirty, and the locks end up 512x more
contended with 1GB pages than with 2MB pages.
We can skip the locking if the folio is already marked as dirty.
The writeback path clears the dirty flag before commencing writeback,
if we see the dirty flag set, the data written to the folio will be
written back.
In one test, throughput increased from 18GB/s to 20GB/s and moved the
bottleneck elsewhere.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
---
block/bio.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index f0c416e5931d..58d30b1dc08e 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -1404,6 +1404,8 @@ void bio_set_pages_dirty(struct bio *bio)
struct folio_iter fi;
bio_for_each_folio_all(fi, bio) {
+ if (folio_test_dirty(fi.folio))
+ continue;
folio_lock(fi.folio);
folio_mark_dirty(fi.folio);
folio_unlock(fi.folio);
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-24 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-24 22:51 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) [this message]
2025-01-28 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-24 22:48 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2025-01-24 22:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-01-27 7:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250124225104.326613-1-willy@infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=andres@anarazel.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox