From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/compaction: fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 22:20:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250123222002.8897374343971b0b8e877307@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250123021029.2826736-1-liushixin2@huawei.com>
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 10:10:29 +0800 Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> wrote:
> syzkaller reported a UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning of (1UL << order)
A Link: to the syzcaller report would be great, please.
> in isolate_freepages_block(). The bogus compound_order can be any value
> because it is union with flags. Add back the MAX_PAGE_ORDER check to fix
> the warning.
OK, I'd never noticed compound_order()'s restrictions before. It looks
like a crazy thing - what use is it if it can return "wild return
values"?
Can someone please explain what's going on here and suggest what we can
do about it?
For example, should we have a compound_order_not_wild() which is called
with refcounted pages and which cannot return "wild" numbers? Or
something else.
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -630,7 +630,8 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
> if (PageCompound(page)) {
> const unsigned int order = compound_order(page);
>
> - if (blockpfn + (1UL << order) <= end_pfn) {
> + if ((order <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER) &&
> + (blockpfn + (1UL << order) <= end_pfn)) {
> blockpfn += (1UL << order) - 1;
> page += (1UL << order) - 1;
> nr_scanned += (1UL << order) - 1;
isolate_migratepages_block()'s
if (skip_isolation_on_order(order, cc->order)) {
doesn't check for "wild" values, but it seems that
skip_isolation_on_order() will handle it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-24 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-23 2:10 Liu Shixin
2025-01-23 6:19 ` Kemeng Shi
2025-01-23 9:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-23 9:42 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-01-24 6:20 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-01-24 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-26 2:05 ` Liu Shixin
2025-01-24 10:07 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250123222002.8897374343971b0b8e877307@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liushixin2@huawei.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox