From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
syzbot+a504cb5bae4fe117ba94@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memfd: reserve hugetlb folios before allocation
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:32:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250114193256.c1cdb555ba24afc9790a40c8@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250114080927.2616684-2-vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:08:00 -0800 Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com> wrote:
> There are cases when we try to pin a folio but discover that it has
> not been faulted-in. So, we try to allocate it in memfd_alloc_folio()
> but there is a chance that we might encounter a crash/failure
> (VM_BUG_ON(!h->resv_huge_pages)) if there are no active reservations
> at that instant. This issue was reported by syzbot:
>
> kernel BUG at mm/hugetlb.c:2403!
>
> ...
>
> Therefore, to avoid this situation and fix this issue, we just need
> to make a reservation (by calling hugetlb_reserve_pages()) before
> we try to allocate the folio. This will ensure that we are properly
> doing region/subpool accounting associated with our allocation.
>
> While at it, move subpool_inode() into hugetlb header and also
> replace the VM_BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE() as there is no need to
> crash the system in this scenario and instead we could just warn
> and fail the allocation.
>
> ...
>
> @@ -2397,12 +2392,15 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio_reserve(struct hstate *h, int preferred_nid,
> struct folio *folio;
>
> spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!h->resv_huge_pages)) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
What is is that we're warning of here? Is there any action which
either kernel developers or the user can take to prevent this warning
from being issued?
IOW, maybe the WARN shouldn't be present?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-14 8:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] " Vivek Kasireddy
2025-01-14 8:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Vivek Kasireddy
2025-01-15 3:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-01-16 5:58 ` Kasireddy, Vivek
2025-01-17 16:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-20 8:02 ` Kasireddy, Vivek
2025-01-14 8:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/udmabuf: add a test to pin first before writing to memfd Vivek Kasireddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250114193256.c1cdb555ba24afc9790a40c8@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
--cc=syzbot+a504cb5bae4fe117ba94@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox