From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: kent.overstreet@linux.dev, yuzhao@google.com, 00107082@163.com,
quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] alloc_tag: skip pgalloc_tag_swap if profiling is disabled
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 17:10:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250114171045.e5fadb8db51902ee0181fa0b@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpHu=nzDNMSFUuxze7V8NDahKPgO6YdF7pk9W8VDC4ME4g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 08:38:37 -0800 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
> > > Well, a 50% reduction in a 0.0000000001% overhead ain't much.
> >
> > I wish the overhead was that low :)
> >
> > I ran more comprehensive testing on Pixel 6 on Big, Medium and Little cores:
> >
> > Overhead before fixes Overhead after fixes
> > slab alloc page alloc slab alloc page alloc
> > Big 6.21% 5.32% 3.31% 4.93%
> > Medium 4.51% 5.05% 3.79% 4.39%
> > Little 7.62% 1.82% 6.68% 1.02%
>
> Hi Andrew,
> I just noticed that you added the above results to the description of
> this patch in mm-unstable: 366507569511 ("alloc_tag: skip
> pgalloc_tag_swap if profiling is disabled") but this improvement is
> mostly caused the the other patch in this series: 80aded2b9492
> ("alloc_tag: avoid current->alloc_tag manipulations when profiling is
> disabled"). If this is not too much trouble, could you please move it
> into the description of the latter patch?
No probs, done, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-26 21:16 [PATCH 1/2] alloc_tag: avoid current->alloc_tag manipulations when " Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-12-26 21:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] alloc_tag: skip pgalloc_tag_swap if " Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-12-26 23:01 ` Andrew Morton
2024-12-26 23:07 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-12-27 0:23 ` Andrew Morton
2024-12-27 0:56 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-12-27 7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2024-12-27 17:28 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-12-27 17:32 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-01-14 16:38 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-01-15 1:10 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-12-27 0:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] alloc_tag: avoid current->alloc_tag manipulations when " Kent Overstreet
2024-12-27 1:07 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-12-27 1:09 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-12-27 1:46 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250114171045.e5fadb8db51902ee0181fa0b@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=00107082@163.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox