From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, peterz@infradead.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com,
nadav.amit@gmail.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
kernel-team@meta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/12] x86/mm: remove pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table call
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:53:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250112155453.1104139-3-riel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250112155453.1104139-1-riel@surriel.com>
Every pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table call ends up calling tlb_remove_table.
Get rid of the indirection by simply calling tlb_remove_table directly,
and not going through the paravirt function pointers.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Suggested-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c | 1 -
arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 5 -----
arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 2 --
arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 1 -
arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 1 -
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c | 16 ++++------------
arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c | 1 -
7 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
index 1cc113200ff5..cbe6c71e17c1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
@@ -240,5 +240,4 @@ void hyperv_setup_mmu_ops(void)
pr_info("Using hypercall for remote TLB flush\n");
pv_ops.mmu.flush_tlb_multi = hyperv_flush_tlb_multi;
- pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table = tlb_remove_table;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
index d4eb9e1d61b8..794ba3647c6c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
@@ -91,11 +91,6 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_multi(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
PVOP_VCALL2(mmu.flush_tlb_multi, cpumask, info);
}
-static inline void paravirt_tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table)
-{
- PVOP_VCALL2(mmu.tlb_remove_table, tlb, table);
-}
-
static inline void paravirt_arch_exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
PVOP_VCALL1(mmu.exit_mmap, mm);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
index 8d4fbe1be489..13405959e4db 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
@@ -136,8 +136,6 @@ struct pv_mmu_ops {
void (*flush_tlb_multi)(const struct cpumask *cpus,
const struct flush_tlb_info *info);
- void (*tlb_remove_table)(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table);
-
/* Hook for intercepting the destruction of an mm_struct. */
void (*exit_mmap)(struct mm_struct *mm);
void (*notify_page_enc_status_changed)(unsigned long pfn, int npages, bool enc);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
index 7a422a6c5983..3be9b3342c67 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
@@ -838,7 +838,6 @@ static void __init kvm_guest_init(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (pv_tlb_flush_supported()) {
pv_ops.mmu.flush_tlb_multi = kvm_flush_tlb_multi;
- pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table = tlb_remove_table;
pr_info("KVM setup pv remote TLB flush\n");
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
index 2b78a6b466ed..c019771e0123 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
@@ -186,7 +186,6 @@ struct paravirt_patch_template pv_ops = {
.mmu.flush_tlb_kernel = native_flush_tlb_global,
.mmu.flush_tlb_one_user = native_flush_tlb_one_user,
.mmu.flush_tlb_multi = native_flush_tlb_multi,
- .mmu.tlb_remove_table = tlb_remove_table,
.mmu.exit_mmap = paravirt_nop,
.mmu.notify_page_enc_status_changed = paravirt_nop,
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
index 5745a354a241..3dc4af1f7868 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
@@ -18,14 +18,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(physical_mask);
#define PGTABLE_HIGHMEM 0
#endif
-#ifndef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
-static inline
-void paravirt_tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table)
-{
- tlb_remove_page(tlb, table);
-}
-#endif
-
gfp_t __userpte_alloc_gfp = GFP_PGTABLE_USER | PGTABLE_HIGHMEM;
pgtable_t pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
@@ -54,7 +46,7 @@ void ___pte_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct page *pte)
{
pagetable_pte_dtor(page_ptdesc(pte));
paravirt_release_pte(page_to_pfn(pte));
- paravirt_tlb_remove_table(tlb, pte);
+ tlb_remove_table(tlb, pte);
}
#if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2
@@ -70,7 +62,7 @@ void ___pmd_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, pmd_t *pmd)
tlb->need_flush_all = 1;
#endif
pagetable_pmd_dtor(ptdesc);
- paravirt_tlb_remove_table(tlb, ptdesc_page(ptdesc));
+ tlb_remove_table(tlb, ptdesc_page(ptdesc));
}
#if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 3
@@ -80,14 +72,14 @@ void ___pud_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, pud_t *pud)
pagetable_pud_dtor(ptdesc);
paravirt_release_pud(__pa(pud) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
- paravirt_tlb_remove_table(tlb, virt_to_page(pud));
+ tlb_remove_table(tlb, virt_to_page(pud));
}
#if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 4
void ___p4d_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, p4d_t *p4d)
{
paravirt_release_p4d(__pa(p4d) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
- paravirt_tlb_remove_table(tlb, virt_to_page(p4d));
+ tlb_remove_table(tlb, virt_to_page(p4d));
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 4 */
#endif /* CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 3 */
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
index 55a4996d0c04..041e17282af0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
@@ -2137,7 +2137,6 @@ static const typeof(pv_ops) xen_mmu_ops __initconst = {
.flush_tlb_kernel = xen_flush_tlb,
.flush_tlb_one_user = xen_flush_tlb_one_user,
.flush_tlb_multi = xen_flush_tlb_multi,
- .tlb_remove_table = tlb_remove_table,
.pgd_alloc = xen_pgd_alloc,
.pgd_free = xen_pgd_free,
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-12 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-12 15:53 [RFC PATCH v4 00/10] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] x86/mm: make MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE unconditional Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 12:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-01-12 15:53 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] x86/mm: consolidate full flush threshold decision Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] x86/mm: get INVLPGB count max from CPUID Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 15:50 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-13 21:08 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 22:53 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] x86/mm: add INVLPGB support code Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 14:21 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-13 21:10 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 14:29 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-14 15:05 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-14 15:23 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-14 15:47 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 16:30 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-14 16:41 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-13 17:24 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-14 1:33 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 18:24 ` Michael Kelley
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] x86/mm: use INVLPGB for kernel TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] x86/tlb: use INVLPGB in flush_tlb_all Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] x86/mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] x86/mm: enable broadcast TLB invalidation for multi-threaded processes Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 13:09 ` Nadav Amit
2025-01-14 3:13 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] x86,tlb: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 17:05 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-13 17:48 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-13 21:16 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] x86/mm: enable AMD translation cache extensions Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 11:32 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-01-14 1:28 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 17:11 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250112155453.1104139-3-riel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox