From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, peterz@infradead.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com,
nadav.amit@gmail.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
kernel-team@meta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/12] x86,tlb: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:53:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250112155453.1104139-11-riel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250112155453.1104139-1-riel@surriel.com>
Instead of doing a system-wide TLB flush from arch_tlbbatch_flush,
queue up asynchronous, targeted flushes from arch_tlbbatch_add_pending.
This also allows us to avoid adding the CPUs of processes using broadcast
flushing to the batch->cpumask, and will hopefully further reduce TLB
flushing from the reclaim and compaction paths.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 12 +++-------
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h
index 1ad56eb3e8a8..f9a17edf63ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch {
* the PFNs being flushed..
*/
struct cpumask cpumask;
+ bool used_invlpgb;
};
#endif /* _ARCH_X86_TLBBATCH_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index cd244cdd49dd..fa4fcafa8b87 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -350,21 +350,15 @@ static inline u64 inc_mm_tlb_gen(struct mm_struct *mm)
return atomic64_inc_return(&mm->context.tlb_gen);
}
-static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
- struct mm_struct *mm,
- unsigned long uaddr)
-{
- inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm);
- cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm));
- mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL);
-}
-
static inline void arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
flush_tlb_mm(mm);
}
extern void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch);
+extern void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
+ struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long uaddr);
static inline bool pte_flags_need_flush(unsigned long oldflags,
unsigned long newflags,
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 80375ef186d5..532911fbb12a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -1658,9 +1658,7 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
* a local TLB flush is needed. Optimize this use-case by calling
* flush_tlb_func_local() directly in this case.
*/
- if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB)) {
- invlpgb_flush_all_nonglobals();
- } else if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) {
+ if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) {
flush_tlb_multi(&batch->cpumask, info);
} else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask)) {
lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
@@ -1669,12 +1667,49 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
local_irq_enable();
}
+ /*
+ * If we issued (asynchronous) INVLPGB flushes, wait for them here.
+ * The cpumask above contains only CPUs that were running tasks
+ * not using broadcast TLB flushing.
+ */
+ if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB) && batch->used_invlpgb) {
+ tlbsync();
+ migrate_enable();
+ batch->used_invlpgb = false;
+ }
+
cpumask_clear(&batch->cpumask);
put_flush_tlb_info();
put_cpu();
}
+void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
+ struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long uaddr)
+{
+ if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB) && mm_global_asid(mm)) {
+ u16 asid = mm_global_asid(mm);
+ /*
+ * Queue up an asynchronous invalidation. The corresponding
+ * TLBSYNC is done in arch_tlbbatch_flush(), and must be done
+ * on the same CPU.
+ */
+ if (!batch->used_invlpgb) {
+ batch->used_invlpgb = true;
+ migrate_disable();
+ }
+ invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(kern_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, false);
+ /* Do any CPUs supporting INVLPGB need PTI? */
+ if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
+ invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(user_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, false);
+ } else {
+ inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm);
+ cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm));
+ }
+ mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL);
+}
+
/*
* Blindly accessing user memory from NMI context can be dangerous
* if we're in the middle of switching the current user task or
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-12 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-12 15:53 [RFC PATCH v4 00/10] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] x86/mm: make MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE unconditional Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 12:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] x86/mm: remove pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table call Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] x86/mm: consolidate full flush threshold decision Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] x86/mm: get INVLPGB count max from CPUID Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 15:50 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-13 21:08 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 22:53 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] x86/mm: add INVLPGB support code Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 14:21 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-13 21:10 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 14:29 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-14 15:05 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-14 15:23 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-14 15:47 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 16:30 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-14 16:41 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-13 17:24 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-14 1:33 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 18:24 ` Michael Kelley
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] x86/mm: use INVLPGB for kernel TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] x86/tlb: use INVLPGB in flush_tlb_all Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] x86/mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] x86/mm: enable broadcast TLB invalidation for multi-threaded processes Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 13:09 ` Nadav Amit
2025-01-14 3:13 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2025-01-13 17:05 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] x86,tlb: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code Jann Horn
2025-01-13 17:48 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-13 21:16 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] x86/mm: enable AMD translation cache extensions Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 11:32 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-01-14 1:28 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 17:11 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250112155453.1104139-11-riel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox