linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/6] mm/migrate: don't call folio_putback_active_hugetlb() on dst hugetlb folio
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 19:21:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250110182149.746551-4-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250110182149.746551-1-david@redhat.com>

We replaced a simple put_page() by a putback_active_hugepage() call in
commit 3aaa76e125c1 ("mm: migrate: hugetlb: putback destination hugepage
to active list"), to set the "active" flag on the dst hugetlb folio.

Nowadays, we decoupled the "active" list from the flag, by calling the
flag "migratable".

Calling "putback" on something that wasn't allocated is weird and not
future proof, especially if we might reach that path when migration failed
and we just want to free the freshly allocated hugetlb folio.

Let's simply set the "migratable" flag in move_hugetlb_state(), where we
know that allocation succeeded, and use simple folio_put() to return
our reference.

Do we need the hugetlb_lock for setting that flag? Staring at other
users of folio_set_hugetlb_migratable(), it does not look like it. After
all, the dst folio should already be on the active list, and we are not
modifying that list.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 5 +++++
 mm/migrate.c | 8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index da98d671088d0..b24ccf8ecbf38 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -7529,6 +7529,11 @@ void move_hugetlb_state(struct folio *old_folio, struct folio *new_folio, int re
 		}
 		spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
 	}
+	/*
+	 * Our old folio is isolated and has "migratable" cleared until it
+	 * is putback. As migration succeeded, set the new folio "migratable".
+	 */
+	folio_set_hugetlb_migratable(new_folio);
 }
 
 static void hugetlb_unshare_pmds(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 80887cadb2774..7e23e78f1e57b 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -1542,14 +1542,14 @@ static int unmap_and_move_huge_page(new_folio_t get_new_folio,
 		list_move_tail(&src->lru, ret);
 
 	/*
-	 * If migration was not successful and there's a freeing callback, use
-	 * it.  Otherwise, put_page() will drop the reference grabbed during
-	 * isolation.
+	 * If migration was not successful and there's a freeing callback,
+	 * return the folio to that special allocator. Otherwise, simply drop
+	 * our additional reference.
 	 */
 	if (put_new_folio)
 		put_new_folio(dst, private);
 	else
-		folio_putback_active_hugetlb(dst);
+		folio_put(dst);
 
 	return rc;
 }
-- 
2.47.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-10 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-10 18:21 [PATCH v1 0/6] mm/hugetlb: folio and migration cleanups David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 18:21 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] mm/huge_memory: convert has_hwpoisoned into a pure folio flag David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 18:39   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-01-10 18:21 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] mm/hugetlb: rename isolate_hugetlb() to folio_isolate_hugetlb() David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 18:41   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-01-13 12:25   ` Baolin Wang
2025-01-10 18:21 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-01-13  7:00   ` [PATCH v1 3/6] mm/migrate: don't call folio_putback_active_hugetlb() on dst hugetlb folio Baolin Wang
2025-01-13  9:50     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-13 12:21       ` Baolin Wang
2025-01-13 12:26         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 18:21 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] mm/hugetlb: rename folio_putback_active_hugetlb() to folio_putback_hugetlb() David Hildenbrand
2025-01-13 12:27   ` Baolin Wang
2025-01-10 18:21 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] mm/hugetlb-cgroup: convert hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline() to work on folios David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 18:45   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-01-10 18:21 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] mm/hugetlb: use folio->lru int demote_free_hugetlb_folios() David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 18:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-01-10 19:32     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 18:23 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] mm/hugetlb: folio and migration cleanups David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 18:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-01-10 19:17     ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250110182149.746551-4-david@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox