From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA0AE7719A for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0F4306B00A4; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 19:43:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 0A57E6B00A5; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 19:43:20 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id EAE456B00A8; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 19:43:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD89D6B00A4 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 19:43:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817F1806E6 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:43:19 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82989693318.07.0EFBB92 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B707E40007 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=F23eFjtG; spf=pass (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1736469797; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=8JpFnWC1bc13Mt4JWzxZtgxpOogwj+3j2PeEHX42F6k=; b=QLEuaQrwYfNzuxlAPShKA9tyE8hrCUCbucSvD+CCj5ucDzeklLo3hEbCNzcizXFm7uxrar 65Q4x81V7A06HGfb3u3guY0XQecrbvs4eSHd43mjKztpkxviqo3WTsa48mti6pbkGg8xeq NVlQ8FNNBqa06R2WYqMlhhCWJNxwb90= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=F23eFjtG; spf=pass (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1736469797; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=xDrp2cjK099lXZue3Qzu/s7xnkqh7HSzFuVpnfPJcmtAv16HZ5/+a8lzxZGEyqT5kc1g8z K8uP63xV5EAdHPM4Il9xbOF5dgD/UkOQghuiX2hOew1vROxvxdqgvlxKOgUGJCOZN961hY yq9qRm2P4puillvhweYJQhcduBORzd8= Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19A45C44FB; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2576FC4CED2; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:43:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1736469796; bh=3GLm8hKeYpJFWLTM88qFWeC/Xe6YM0BmZ7p/eyKGnFI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=F23eFjtGSMZcN2gyId5EbCf1IAtkUOHHc0uXlmVQKZ6S/ZqxIqlJeylapfnqYBgFr gjIE+w4yYLqeI5X6s5WS9kQZ4uLkN/yLFTHyLl3zN3wL39HhrOckIlLnFYq8LsMxNc eM4PXR7pyS7y9lAg5u7FymkyUiLXWRX3fyWvRrQY= Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 16:43:15 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Weikang Guo Cc: Alexander Gordeev , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/s390: save_area_alloc default failure behavior changed to panic Message-Id: <20250109164315.b21f40e1b757b1cf9eb7e042@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250109033136.2845676-1-guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Stat-Signature: h8preeyqiwuykpsd8mzqpdzkqyj6sm9y X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B707E40007 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1736469797-998489 X-HE-Meta: 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 GwJjeZ/U 7cjv5c9T1Hs0Pj4z8gOhkwQt+KcfQWhgJXMNZL/goRC4qvCX9m2rrkwEijIPLtvFIeic+5zp4UXwFpDdMvPYwezJ2PiMEB4wpXNdU0Jl2eP+7XEkBifKs3tOpeiQdkJzTJfI+rZUOQmVWD4LD6/QR+8GzhPBcOR5pM4anIHuvdcbOSEr+wIcqgJEjEx80mb2UwTWEk3GZwpoRGmjFk8/p7pgd2q47iNWH6A6s6e/sCiD/hjD04A0gZd7LW6PromM1UfHryM6uvEW4nejSpbVOVCvhbtfleY6onWlFmnQAjND3oEdWI3gG/La6rwU9z0QAYYf38qoU3LirJ/ltnm0+1He9XgnTdCJBekHlcu9Ez/2AsdKt61sW3UEvgw== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 22:53:57 +0800 Weikang Guo wrote: > I understand your point, you want to modify directly based on the > original patch. > If we repost it,it may not be v8 but v9. > > Last v8 patch: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250102072528.650926-1-guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com > > I reduced the recipients for V8 because I remembered that the number > of CCs might > have exceeded the limit at the time, and there hadn't been any > comments on V7 for a long time > > > @Andrew, is that still possible? > > @Andrew, I can cooperate if necessary, I could merge them into one > patch and repost. I'll fold this patch ("arch/s390: save_area_alloc default failure behavior changed to panic") into "mm-memblock-add-memblock_alloc_or_panic-interface.patch", v8 before sending the latter upstream. But I'm not sure that we've completed the review discussion of "mm/memblock: add memblock_alloc_or_panic interface" with Mike?