From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33830E77188 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 05:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B573C6B0083; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 00:53:15 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B07646B0089; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 00:53:15 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A1D896B008A; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 00:53:15 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837466B0083 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 00:53:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin27.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A7F120FA3 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 05:53:15 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82983216750.27.3F660F5 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D654180009 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 05:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de designates 213.95.11.211 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1736315593; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ayfLp4M1/Tltvkil26ubMzwnVgEz5YzfjAqBt5vQtIQ=; b=JFvX99wO9czXZC5IzAo7tr9mmEpSJ1uZKzMJj+d8ge2r+TE5tExmYz+iJV5UyMsxSI1csc +IxjQuIJQ/VtPKhvySIiUb6BDq3wh/JCG51dYtSdb8PMSsTpDXkXXbanbsFUjUNTsx29IF RrAwColN4sK8NMHjhOmUXlXGSzgwRxw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de designates 213.95.11.211 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1736315593; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=AAe+6dtir3EcW2QpikjS+5MTSjw7wgpFSTXF89D/czRO+HdkvSSo4E09aJrjUB/wVJ2YSe YUaxvhctq8IqZIrj3cG3ynPjd8ckgs069T2qNzIr4cpY8qfDR/apmhvu4AnxGz+d8gTzPz Kv9eZ5enKFOLFIaidOez0YSw01GgJag= Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 46BC868BEB; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:53:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:53:09 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Alistair Popple Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, jhubbard@nvidia.com, hch@lst.de Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] mm: Remove callers of pfn_t functionality Message-ID: <20250108055309.GD20341@lst.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Stat-Signature: 1rh7f8yrhtbtzbmcy6xewm1kac4qzkop X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5D654180009 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1736315593-907969 X-HE-Meta: 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 xbx/LI8W bN2DYJNCJi/Tuf59QJN7hasA81WKRFBBMwqRispN0iumNt4pLUHWe1dEHvOs2d8xvphkmEXiFXsM5sDlHNXs9Z4A8tQDJko/Vf/g5q628CJXaiq+Sxd4R0BfEnw== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 12:18:47PM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote: > All PFN_* pfn_t flags have been removed. Therefore there is no longer > a need for the pfn_t type and all uses can be replaced with normal > pfns. Looks good in general: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Would be nice if you'd fix up the created overly long line everywhere and not just in a few places, though.