linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ioworker0@gmail.com,
	david@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, zhengtangquan@oppo.com,
	ying.huang@intel.com, kasong@tencent.com, chrisl@kernel.org,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: Support tlbbatch flush for a range of PTEs
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 18:07:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202501061736.FoHcInHJ-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250106031711.82855-3-21cnbao@gmail.com>

Hi Barry,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Barry-Song/mm-set-folio-swapbacked-iff-folios-are-dirty-in-try_to_unmap_one/20250106-112638
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250106031711.82855-3-21cnbao%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/3] mm: Support tlbbatch flush for a range of PTEs
config: riscv-randconfig-001-20250106 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250106/202501061736.FoHcInHJ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250106/202501061736.FoHcInHJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501061736.FoHcInHJ-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   mm/rmap.c: In function 'set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending':
>> mm/rmap.c:685:9: error: too many arguments to function 'arch_tlbbatch_add_pending'
     685 |         arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(&tlb_ubc->arch, mm, uaddr, size);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h:113,
                    from include/linux/pgtable.h:6,
                    from include/linux/mm.h:30,
                    from mm/rmap.c:55:
   arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h:62:6: note: declared here
      62 | void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/arch_tlbbatch_add_pending +685 mm/rmap.c

   663	
   664	/*
   665	 * Bits 0-14 of mm->tlb_flush_batched record pending generations.
   666	 * Bits 16-30 of mm->tlb_flush_batched bit record flushed generations.
   667	 */
   668	#define TLB_FLUSH_BATCH_FLUSHED_SHIFT	16
   669	#define TLB_FLUSH_BATCH_PENDING_MASK			\
   670		((1 << (TLB_FLUSH_BATCH_FLUSHED_SHIFT - 1)) - 1)
   671	#define TLB_FLUSH_BATCH_PENDING_LARGE			\
   672		(TLB_FLUSH_BATCH_PENDING_MASK / 2)
   673	
   674	static void set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t pteval,
   675					      unsigned long uaddr,
   676					      unsigned long size)
   677	{
   678		struct tlbflush_unmap_batch *tlb_ubc = &current->tlb_ubc;
   679		int batch;
   680		bool writable = pte_dirty(pteval);
   681	
   682		if (!pte_accessible(mm, pteval))
   683			return;
   684	
 > 685		arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(&tlb_ubc->arch, mm, uaddr, size);
   686		tlb_ubc->flush_required = true;
   687	
   688		/*
   689		 * Ensure compiler does not re-order the setting of tlb_flush_batched
   690		 * before the PTE is cleared.
   691		 */
   692		barrier();
   693		batch = atomic_read(&mm->tlb_flush_batched);
   694	retry:
   695		if ((batch & TLB_FLUSH_BATCH_PENDING_MASK) > TLB_FLUSH_BATCH_PENDING_LARGE) {
   696			/*
   697			 * Prevent `pending' from catching up with `flushed' because of
   698			 * overflow.  Reset `pending' and `flushed' to be 1 and 0 if
   699			 * `pending' becomes large.
   700			 */
   701			if (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&mm->tlb_flush_batched, &batch, 1))
   702				goto retry;
   703		} else {
   704			atomic_inc(&mm->tlb_flush_batched);
   705		}
   706	
   707		/*
   708		 * If the PTE was dirty then it's best to assume it's writable. The
   709		 * caller must use try_to_unmap_flush_dirty() or try_to_unmap_flush()
   710		 * before the page is queued for IO.
   711		 */
   712		if (writable)
   713			tlb_ubc->writable = true;
   714	}
   715	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-06 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-06  3:17 [PATCH 0/3] mm: batched unmap lazyfree large folios during reclamation Barry Song
2025-01-06  3:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: set folio swapbacked iff folios are dirty in try_to_unmap_one Barry Song
2025-01-06  6:40   ` Baolin Wang
2025-01-06  9:03     ` Barry Song
2025-01-06  9:34       ` Baolin Wang
2025-01-06 14:39         ` Lance Yang
2025-01-06 20:52           ` Barry Song
2025-01-06 20:56             ` Barry Song
2025-01-07  1:33           ` Lance Yang
2025-01-06  3:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: Support tlbbatch flush for a range of PTEs Barry Song
2025-01-06  8:22   ` kernel test robot
2025-01-13  0:55     ` Barry Song
2025-01-13 13:13       ` Oliver Sang
2025-01-06 10:07   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-01-13  0:56     ` Barry Song
2025-01-13  7:30       ` Oliver Sang
2025-01-06  3:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: Support batched unmap for lazyfree large folios during reclamation Barry Song
2025-01-06 17:28 ` [PATCH 0/3] mm: batched unmap " Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-06 19:15   ` Barry Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202501061736.FoHcInHJ-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
    --cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox