Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v4 0/7] mm/mglru: performance optimizations

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 08:59:08 +0800 chenridong <chenridong@huawei.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 2025/1/3 8:03, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 21:35:31 -0700 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> This series improves performance for some previously reported test
> >> cases. Most of the code changes gathered here has been floating on the
> >> mailing list [1][2]. They are now properly organized and have gone
> >> through various benchmarks on client and server devices, including
> >> Android, FIO, memcached, multiple VMs and MongoDB.
> > 
> > This series has significant conflicts with the patch "mm: vmscan: retry
> > folios written back while isolated for traditional LRU".  It appears
> > that "mm: vmscan: retry folios written back while isolated for
> > traditional LRU" is due for an update and that more discussion is
> > needed, so I shall drop this version of "mm: vmscan: retry folios
> > written back while isolated for traditional LRU" from mm-unstable.
> 
> Hi, Andrew and Yu, does this mean I should resend a new version that
> fixes the conflict and updates the message?

Yes please.  Against
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git/'s
mm-unstable branch would be ideal.

Please already double-check that all review comments have been
addressed in an appropriate fashion.