* [PATCH] mm/memmap: Prevent double scanning of memmap by kmemleak
@ 2025-01-02 6:57 Guo Weikang
2025-01-02 9:12 ` kernel test robot
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guo Weikang @ 2025-01-02 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas, Mike Rapoport, Andrew Morton
Cc: Guo Weikang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
kmemleak explicitly scans the mem_map through the valid struct page objects.
However, memmap_alloc() was also adding this memory to the gray object list,
causing it to be scanned twice. Removes memmap_alloc() from the
scan list and adds a comment to clarify the behavior.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAOm6qn=FVeTpH54wGDFMHuCOeYtvoTx30ktnv9-w3Nh8RMofEA@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Guo Weikang <guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/memblock.h | 8 +++++++-
mm/mm_init.c | 8 ++++++--
mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 20 ++------------------
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 673d5cae7c81..b0483c534ef7 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -375,7 +375,13 @@ static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
-/* Flags for memblock allocation APIs */
+/*
+ * Flags for memblock allocation APIs
+ * MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE and MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
+ * indicates wheather the allocation is limited by memblock.current_limit.
+ * MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE not only indicates that it does not need to
+ * be scanned by kmemleak, but also implies MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
+ */
#define MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE (~(phys_addr_t)0)
#define MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE 0
#define MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE 1
diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
index 24b68b425afb..71b58f5f2492 100644
--- a/mm/mm_init.c
+++ b/mm/mm_init.c
@@ -1580,6 +1580,10 @@ static void __init free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
}
}
+/*
+ * Kmemleak will explicitly scan mem_map by traversing all valid `struct *page`,
+ * so memblock does not need to be added to the scan list.
+ */
void __init *memmap_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
phys_addr_t min_addr, int nid, bool exact_nid)
{
@@ -1587,11 +1591,11 @@ void __init *memmap_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
if (exact_nid)
ptr = memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(size, align, min_addr,
- MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE,
+ MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE,
nid);
else
ptr = memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(size, align, min_addr,
- MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE,
+ MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE,
nid);
if (ptr && size > 0)
diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
index cec67c5f37d8..b6ac9b1d4ff7 100644
--- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
+++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
@@ -27,25 +27,10 @@
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
-
+#include "internal.h"
#include <asm/dma.h>
#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
-/*
- * Allocate a block of memory to be used to back the virtual memory map
- * or to back the page tables that are used to create the mapping.
- * Uses the main allocators if they are available, else bootmem.
- */
-
-static void * __ref __earlyonly_bootmem_alloc(int node,
- unsigned long size,
- unsigned long align,
- unsigned long goal)
-{
- return memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(size, align, goal,
- MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, node);
-}
-
void * __meminit vmemmap_alloc_block(unsigned long size, int node)
{
/* If the main allocator is up use that, fallback to bootmem. */
@@ -66,8 +51,7 @@ void * __meminit vmemmap_alloc_block(unsigned long size, int node)
}
return NULL;
} else
- return __earlyonly_bootmem_alloc(node, size, size,
- __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS));
+ return memmap_alloc(size, size, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS), node, false);
}
static void * __meminit altmap_alloc_block_buf(unsigned long size,
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/memmap: Prevent double scanning of memmap by kmemleak
2025-01-02 6:57 [PATCH] mm/memmap: Prevent double scanning of memmap by kmemleak Guo Weikang
@ 2025-01-02 9:12 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-02 17:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-01-03 10:56 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-01-02 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guo Weikang, Catalin Marinas, Mike Rapoport, Andrew Morton
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List, Guo Weikang, linux-kernel
Hi Guo,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Guo-Weikang/mm-memmap-Prevent-double-scanning-of-memmap-by-kmemleak/20250102-145930
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250102065704.647693-1-guoweikang.kernel%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] mm/memmap: Prevent double scanning of memmap by kmemleak
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20250102 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250102/202501021601.jub4p3EM-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250102/202501021601.jub4p3EM-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501021601.jub4p3EM-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
>> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: vmemmap_alloc_block+0xfa (section: .text) -> memmap_alloc (section: .init.text)
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/memmap: Prevent double scanning of memmap by kmemleak
2025-01-02 6:57 [PATCH] mm/memmap: Prevent double scanning of memmap by kmemleak Guo Weikang
2025-01-02 9:12 ` kernel test robot
@ 2025-01-02 17:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-01-03 0:01 ` Weikang Guo
2025-01-03 10:56 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2025-01-02 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guo Weikang; +Cc: Mike Rapoport, Andrew Morton, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 02:57:03PM +0800, Guo Weikang wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index 673d5cae7c81..b0483c534ef7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -375,7 +375,13 @@ static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>
> -/* Flags for memblock allocation APIs */
> +/*
> + * Flags for memblock allocation APIs
> + * MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE and MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
> + * indicates wheather the allocation is limited by memblock.current_limit.
> + * MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE not only indicates that it does not need to
> + * be scanned by kmemleak, but also implies MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
> + */
I'd keep the comment short here, something like:
/*
* MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE avoids kmemleak tracing. It implies
* MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE.
*/
> #define MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE (~(phys_addr_t)0)
> #define MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE 0
> #define MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE 1
> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> index 24b68b425afb..71b58f5f2492 100644
> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> @@ -1580,6 +1580,10 @@ static void __init free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Kmemleak will explicitly scan mem_map by traversing all valid `struct *page`,
> + * so memblock does not need to be added to the scan list.
> + */
> void __init *memmap_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
> phys_addr_t min_addr, int nid, bool exact_nid)
> {
> @@ -1587,11 +1591,11 @@ void __init *memmap_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
>
> if (exact_nid)
> ptr = memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(size, align, min_addr,
> - MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE,
> + MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE,
> nid);
> else
> ptr = memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(size, align, min_addr,
> - MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE,
> + MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE,
> nid);
>
> if (ptr && size > 0)
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index cec67c5f37d8..b6ac9b1d4ff7 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -27,25 +27,10 @@
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> -
> +#include "internal.h"
> #include <asm/dma.h>
> #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>
> -/*
> - * Allocate a block of memory to be used to back the virtual memory map
> - * or to back the page tables that are used to create the mapping.
> - * Uses the main allocators if they are available, else bootmem.
> - */
> -
> -static void * __ref __earlyonly_bootmem_alloc(int node,
> - unsigned long size,
> - unsigned long align,
> - unsigned long goal)
> -{
> - return memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(size, align, goal,
> - MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, node);
> -}
> -
> void * __meminit vmemmap_alloc_block(unsigned long size, int node)
> {
> /* If the main allocator is up use that, fallback to bootmem. */
> @@ -66,8 +51,7 @@ void * __meminit vmemmap_alloc_block(unsigned long size, int node)
> }
> return NULL;
> } else
> - return __earlyonly_bootmem_alloc(node, size, size,
> - __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS));
> + return memmap_alloc(size, size, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS), node, false);
> }
As the kernel test robot reported, the __ref annotation for
__earlyonly_bootmem_alloc() is still needed, otherwise you get a warning
that a __meminit function (vmemmap_alloc_block()) is calling an __init
one (memmap_alloc()). So I think it's better if you keep this function.
Maybe get it to call memmap_alloc() instead of
memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw().
--
Catalin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/memmap: Prevent double scanning of memmap by kmemleak
2025-01-02 17:15 ` Catalin Marinas
@ 2025-01-03 0:01 ` Weikang Guo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Weikang Guo @ 2025-01-03 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas; +Cc: Mike Rapoport, Andrew Morton, linux-mm, linux-kernel
Hi,Catalin
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote on Friday, 3 January 2025 01:15:
>
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 02:57:03PM +0800, Guo Weikang wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > index 673d5cae7c81..b0483c534ef7 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > @@ -375,7 +375,13 @@ static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r)
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> >
> > -/* Flags for memblock allocation APIs */
> > +/*
> > + * Flags for memblock allocation APIs
> > + * MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE and MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
> > + * indicates wheather the allocation is limited by memblock.current_limit.
> > + * MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE not only indicates that it does not need to
> > + * be scanned by kmemleak, but also implies MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
> > + */
>
> I'd keep the comment short here, something like:
>
> /*
> * MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE avoids kmemleak tracing. It implies
> * MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE.
> */
>
Thanks, the previous version would be a bit redundant.
> > -/*
> > - * Allocate a block of memory to be used to back the virtual memory map
> > - * or to back the page tables that are used to create the mapping.
> > - * Uses the main allocators if they are available, else bootmem.
> > - */
> > -
> > -static void * __ref __earlyonly_bootmem_alloc(int node,
> > - unsigned long size,
> > - unsigned long align,
> > - unsigned long goal)
> > -{
> > - return memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(size, align, goal,
> > - MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, node);
> > -}
> > -
> > void * __meminit vmemmap_alloc_block(unsigned long size, int node)
> > {
> > /* If the main allocator is up use that, fallback to bootmem. */
> > @@ -66,8 +51,7 @@ void * __meminit vmemmap_alloc_block(unsigned long size, int node)
> > }
> > return NULL;
> > } else
> > - return __earlyonly_bootmem_alloc(node, size, size,
> > - __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS));
> > + return memmap_alloc(size, size, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS), node, false);
> > }
>
> As the kernel test robot reported, the __ref annotation for
> __earlyonly_bootmem_alloc() is still needed, otherwise you get a warning
> that a __meminit function (vmemmap_alloc_block()) is calling an __init
> one (memmap_alloc()). So I think it's better if you keep this function.
> Maybe get it to call memmap_alloc() instead of
> memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw().
>
I have also noticed and studied the previous implementation, it is clear to me
that _ref annotation is used to prevent init section mismatch WARNING.
I will recover __earlyonly_bootmem_alloc().
> --
> Catalin
Thanks a lot
--
Guo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/memmap: Prevent double scanning of memmap by kmemleak
2025-01-02 6:57 [PATCH] mm/memmap: Prevent double scanning of memmap by kmemleak Guo Weikang
2025-01-02 9:12 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-02 17:15 ` Catalin Marinas
@ 2025-01-03 10:56 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-01-03 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guo Weikang, Catalin Marinas, Mike Rapoport, Andrew Morton
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List, Guo Weikang,
linux-kernel
Hi Guo,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Guo-Weikang/mm-memmap-Prevent-double-scanning-of-memmap-by-kmemleak/20250102-145930
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250102065704.647693-1-guoweikang.kernel%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] mm/memmap: Prevent double scanning of memmap by kmemleak
config: x86_64-randconfig-072-20250103 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250103/202501031757.LDH2bhm8-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250103/202501031757.LDH2bhm8-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501031757.LDH2bhm8-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
>> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: vmemmap_alloc_block+0x8c (section: .text.vmemmap_alloc_block) -> memmap_alloc (section: .init.text)
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/fpga/tests/fpga-mgr-test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/fpga/tests/fpga-bridge-test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/fpga/tests/fpga-region-test.o
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-03 10:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-02 6:57 [PATCH] mm/memmap: Prevent double scanning of memmap by kmemleak Guo Weikang
2025-01-02 9:12 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-02 17:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-01-03 0:01 ` Weikang Guo
2025-01-03 10:56 ` kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox