From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Guo Weikang <guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] mm/memblock: Add memblock_alloc_or_panic interface
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 15:08:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250102150835.776fe72f565cc3232d83e6a7@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250102072528.650926-1-guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 15:25:28 +0800 Guo Weikang <guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Before SLUB initialization, various subsystems used memblock_alloc to
> allocate memory. In most cases, when memory allocation fails, an immediate
> panic is required. To simplify this behavior and reduce repetitive checks,
> introduce `memblock_alloc_or_panic`. This function ensures that memory
> allocation failures result in a panic automatically, improving code
> readability and consistency across subsystems that require this behavior.
Just to be annoying...
We now have many more calls to memblock_alloc_or_panic() than to
memblock_alloc(). So perhaps memblock_alloc() should default to
panicing and we add a new memblock_alloc_no_panic() for the exceptional
cases.
And from looking around a bit, I think many of the remaining calls to
memblock_alloc() could be made to panic on failure anyway. If the
kernel cannot successfully execute memblock_alloc(small amount) at
__init time then the kernel is hopelessly broken and there's no point
in proceeding?
In fact I wonder if there is really any legitimate use of
memblock_alloc_no_panic()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-02 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-02 7:25 Guo Weikang
2025-01-02 9:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-01-02 23:08 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-01-03 0:29 ` Weikang Guo
2025-01-10 10:15 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250102150835.776fe72f565cc3232d83e6a7@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox