linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCHv2 7/7] zram: cond_resched() in writeback loop
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 15:34:24 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241218063513.297475-8-senozhatsky@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241218063513.297475-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org>

zram writeback is a costly operation, because every target slot
(unless ZRAM_HUGE) is decompressed before it gets written to a
backing device.  The writeback to a backing device uses
submit_bio_wait() which may look like a rescheduling point.
However, if the backing device has BD_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO bit set
__submit_bio() calls directly disk->fops->submit_bio(bio) on
the backing device and so when submit_bio_wait() calls
blk_wait_io() the I/O is already done.  On such systems we
effective end up in a loop

    for_each (target slot) {
	decompress(slot)
	__submit_bio()
	    disk->fops->submit_bio(bio)
    }

Which on PREEMPT_NONE systems triggers watchdogs (since there
are no explicit rescheduling points).  Add cond_resched() to
the zram writeback loop.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 7dd72b58e921..5b8e4f4171ab 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -884,6 +884,8 @@ static ssize_t writeback_store(struct device *dev,
 next:
 		zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
 		release_pp_slot(zram, pps);
+
+		cond_resched();
 	}
 
 	if (blk_idx)
-- 
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-18  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-18  6:34 [PATCHv2 0/7] zram: split page type read/write handling Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-12-18  6:34 ` [PATCHv2 1/7] zram: free slot memory early during write Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-12-18  6:34 ` [PATCHv2 2/7] zram: remove entry element member Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-12-18  6:34 ` [PATCHv2 3/7] zram: factor out ZRAM_SAME write Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-12-18  6:34 ` [PATCHv2 4/7] zram: factor out ZRAM_HUGE write Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-12-18  6:34 ` [PATCHv2 5/7] zram: factor out different page types read Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-12-18  6:34 ` [PATCHv2 6/7] zram: use zram_read_from_zspool() in writeback Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-12-18  6:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241218063513.297475-8-senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox