From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: hare@suse.de, willy@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.org, kbusch@kernel.org
Cc: john.g.garry@oracle.com, hch@lst.de, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
gost.dev@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com, da.gomez@samsung.com,
kernel@pankajraghav.com, mcgrof@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] fs/buffer: add a for_each_bh() for block_read_full_folio()
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 18:26:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241218022626.3668119-4-mcgrof@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241218022626.3668119-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
We want to be able to work through all buffer heads on a folio
for an async read, but in the future we want to support the option
to stop before we've processed all linked buffer heads. To make
code easier to read and follow adopt a for_each_bh(tmp, head) loop
instead of using a do { ... } while () to make the code easier to
read and later be expanded in subsequent patches.
This introduces no functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
---
fs/buffer.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 8baf87db110d..1aeef7dd2281 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -2397,6 +2397,17 @@ static void bh_read_batch_async(struct folio *folio,
}
}
+#define bh_is_last(__bh, __head) ((__bh)->b_this_page == (__head))
+
+#define bh_next(__bh, __head) \
+ (bh_is_last(__bh, __head) ? NULL : (__bh)->b_this_page)
+
+/* Starts from the provided head */
+#define for_each_bh(__tmp, __head) \
+ for ((__tmp) = (__head); \
+ (__tmp); \
+ (__tmp) = bh_next(__tmp, __head))
+
/*
* Generic "read_folio" function for block devices that have the normal
* get_block functionality. This is most of the block device filesystems.
@@ -2426,13 +2437,14 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
iblock = div_u64(folio_pos(folio), blocksize);
lblock = div_u64(limit + blocksize - 1, blocksize);
- bh = head;
nr = 0;
/* Stage one - collect buffer heads we need issue a read for */
- do {
- if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
+ for_each_bh(bh, head) {
+ if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
+ iblock++;
continue;
+ }
if (!buffer_mapped(bh)) {
int err = 0;
@@ -2449,17 +2461,21 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
blocksize);
if (!err)
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+ iblock++;
continue;
}
/*
* get_block() might have updated the buffer
* synchronously
*/
- if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
+ if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
+ iblock++;
continue;
+ }
}
arr[nr++] = bh;
- } while (iblock++, (bh = bh->b_this_page) != head);
+ iblock++;
+ }
bh_read_batch_async(folio, nr, arr, fully_mapped, nr == 0, page_error);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-18 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-18 2:26 [PATCH 0/5] fs/buffer: strack reduction on async read Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18 2:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs/buffer: move async batch read code into a helper Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18 2:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs/buffer: simplify block_read_full_folio() with bh_offset() Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18 2:26 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2024-12-18 19:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] fs/buffer: add a for_each_bh() for block_read_full_folio() Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-18 2:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs/buffer: add iteration support " Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18 2:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] fs/buffer: reduce stack usage on bh_read_iter() Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18 2:47 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18 20:05 ` [PATCH 0/5] fs/buffer: strack reduction on async read Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-19 2:27 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-19 3:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-30 17:30 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-01-31 16:54 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-01-31 22:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-03 14:00 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-19 6:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-19 17:53 ` Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241218022626.3668119-4-mcgrof@kernel.org \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox