linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15.y 1/2] mm/damon/vaddr-test: split a test function having >1024 bytes frame size
Date: Fri,  6 Dec 2024 10:16:19 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241206181620.91603-2-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241206181620.91603-1-sj@kernel.org>

On some configuration[1], 'damon_test_split_evenly()' kunit test
function has >1024 bytes frame size, so below build warning is
triggered:

      CC      mm/damon/vaddr.o
    In file included from mm/damon/vaddr.c:672:
    mm/damon/vaddr-test.h: In function 'damon_test_split_evenly':
    mm/damon/vaddr-test.h:309:1: warning: the frame size of 1064 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
      309 | }
          | ^

This commit fixes the warning by separating the common logic in the
function.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202111182146.OV3C4uGr-lkp@intel.com/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211201150440.1088-6-sj@kernel.org
Fixes: 17ccae8bb5c9 ("mm/damon: add kunit tests")
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 044cd9750fe010170f5dc812e4824d98f5ea928c)
---
 mm/damon/vaddr-test.h | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
index 1f5c13257dba..95ec362cdc37 100644
--- a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
@@ -252,59 +252,62 @@ static void damon_test_apply_three_regions4(struct kunit *test)
 			new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
 }
 
-static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
+static void damon_test_split_evenly_fail(struct kunit *test,
+		unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces)
 {
-	struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx();
-	struct damon_target *t;
-	struct damon_region *r;
-	unsigned long i;
-
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(NULL, NULL, 5),
-			-EINVAL);
-
-	t = damon_new_target(42);
-	r = damon_new_region(0, 100);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 0), -EINVAL);
+	struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target(42);
+	struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end);
 
 	damon_add_region(r, t);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 10), 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 10u);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+			damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), -EINVAL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u);
 
-	i = 0;
 	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, i++ * 10);
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, i * 10);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, start);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end);
 	}
+
 	damon_free_target(t);
+}
+
+static void damon_test_split_evenly_succ(struct kunit *test,
+	unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces)
+{
+	struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target(42);
+	struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end);
+	unsigned long expected_width = (end - start) / nr_pieces;
+	unsigned long i = 0;
 
-	t = damon_new_target(42);
-	r = damon_new_region(5, 59);
 	damon_add_region(r, t);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 5), 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 5u);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+			damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), nr_pieces);
 
-	i = 0;
 	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
-		if (i == 4)
+		if (i == nr_pieces - 1)
 			break;
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5 + 10 * i++);
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 5 + 10 * i);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+				r->ar.start, start + i++ * expected_width);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, start + i * expected_width);
 	}
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5 + 10 * i);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 59ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, start + i * expected_width);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end);
 	damon_free_target(t);
+}
 
-	t = damon_new_target(42);
-	r = damon_new_region(5, 6);
-	damon_add_region(r, t);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 2), -EINVAL);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u);
+static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx();
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(NULL, NULL, 5),
+			-EINVAL);
+
+	damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 0, 100, 0);
+	damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 100, 10);
+	damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 5, 59, 5);
+	damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 5, 6, 2);
 
-	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5ul);
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 6ul);
-	}
-	damon_free_target(t);
 	damon_destroy_ctx(c);
 }
 
-- 
2.39.5



  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-06 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2024120625-recycling-till-0cca@gregkh>
2024-12-06 18:16 ` [PATCH 5.15.y 0/2] fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region() SeongJae Park
2024-12-06 18:16   ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2024-12-06 20:30     ` [PATCH 5.15.y 1/2] mm/damon/vaddr-test: split a test function having >1024 bytes frame size David Laight
2024-12-06 18:16   ` [PATCH 5.15.y 2/2] mm/damon/vaddr: fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region() SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241206181620.91603-2-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox