From: cel@kernel.org
To: Hugh Dickens <hughd@google.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
yukuai3@huawei.com, yangerkun@huaweicloud.com,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] Improve simple directory offset wrap behavior
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 10:52:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241204155257.1110338-1-cel@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
The purpose of this series is to construct a set of upstream fixes
that can be backported to v6.6 to address CVE-2024-46701.
My original plan was to add a cursor dentry. However, I've found a
solution that does not need one. In fact, most or all of the
reported issues are gone with 4/5. Thus I'm not sure 5/5 is
necessary, but it seems like a robust improvement.
Changes since v3:
- Series is no longer RFC
- Series passes xfstests locally and via NFS export
- Patch 2/5 was replaced; it now removes simple_offset_empty()
- 4/5 and 5/5 were rewritten based on test results
- Patch descriptions have been clarified
This series (still against v6.12) has been pushed to:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cel/linux.git/log/?h=tmpfs-fixes
Next step is to try backporting these to v6.6 to see if anything
else is needed.
Chuck Lever (5):
libfs: Return ENOSPC when the directory offset range is exhausted
Revert "libfs: Add simple_offset_empty()"
Revert "libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir"
libfs: Replace simple_offset end-of-directory detection
libfs: Use d_children list to iterate simple_offset directories
fs/libfs.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
include/linux/fs.h | 1 -
mm/shmem.c | 4 +-
3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
--
2.47.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-04 15:52 cel [this message]
2024-12-04 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] libfs: Return ENOSPC when the directory offset range is exhausted cel
2024-12-04 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] Revert "libfs: Add simple_offset_empty()" cel
2024-12-04 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] Revert "libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir" cel
2024-12-04 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] libfs: Replace simple_offset end-of-directory detection cel
2024-12-04 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] libfs: Use d_children list to iterate simple_offset directories cel
2024-12-08 17:11 ` Chuck Lever
2024-12-14 17:13 ` Chuck Lever
2024-12-14 17:49 ` Al Viro
2024-12-14 19:22 ` Chuck Lever
2024-12-14 19:59 ` Al Viro
2024-12-05 17:09 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Improve simple directory offset wrap behavior Christian Brauner
2024-12-05 22:16 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241204155257.1110338-1-cel@kernel.org \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yangerkun@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox