linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cel@kernel.org
To: Hugh Dickens <hughd@google.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	yukuai3@huawei.com, yangerkun@huaweicloud.com,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] Improve simple directory offset wrap behavior
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 10:54:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241126155444.2556-1-cel@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>

This series attempts to narrow some gaps in the current tmpfs
directory offset mechanism that relate to misbehaviors reported by
Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> and Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>.

This series replaces the v1 mechanism I posted last week. It
reverts offset_readdir() to use the directory's d_children list,
instead of its mtree, for finding the next entry, as readdir did
before v6.6. Directory offset values continue to be allocated via
an mtree.

The purpose of this change is to enable readdir results to continue
to appear after a directory offset/cookie value wrap, while not
regressing generic/736. That should enable this fix to be
backported (manually) to v6.6 to address CVE-2024-46701.

These are still a little unpolished. I expect review to find
opportunities for further code reuse.

These patches pass xfstests except for generic/013, generic/637, and
generic/650. There appears to be a problem with WHITEOUT renames
which I am still looking into.

The series has been pushed to:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cel/linux.git/log/?h=tmpfs-fixes

Chuck Lever (5):
  libfs: Return ENOSPC when the directory offset range is exhausted
  libfs: Check dentry before locking in simple_offset_empty()
  Revert "libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir"
  libfs: Refactor end-of-directory detection for simple_offset
    directories
  libfs: Refactor offset_iterate_dir()

 fs/libfs.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.0



             reply	other threads:[~2024-11-26 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-26 15:54 cel [this message]
2024-11-26 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] libfs: Return ENOSPC when the directory offset range is exhausted cel
2024-11-27  3:11   ` yangerkun
2024-11-26 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] libfs: Check dentry before locking in simple_offset_empty() cel
2024-11-27  3:09   ` yangerkun
2024-11-27 14:36     ` Chuck Lever
2024-11-29  8:17       ` yangerkun
2024-11-30 17:03         ` Chuck Lever
2024-11-26 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] Revert "libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir" cel
2024-11-26 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] libfs: Refactor end-of-directory detection for simple_offset directories cel
2024-11-26 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] libfs: Refactor offset_iterate_dir() cel
2024-11-26 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] Improve simple directory offset wrap behavior Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-26 16:59   ` Chuck Lever III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241126155444.2556-1-cel@kernel.org \
    --to=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yangerkun@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox