From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EBAD75E2D for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 12:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 865956B00B2; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:06:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7ECC86B00B3; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:06:43 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 68D7C6B00B6; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:06:43 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EFC6B00B2 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:06:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin11.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED596121540 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 12:06:42 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82813603278.11.4E263EA Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C473180008 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 12:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de designates 213.95.11.211 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1732277049; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E4LGUtuulzz5ua5TIvz45/5B2RDTa7P7gSUNgojBfug=; b=F8mZB3mRq88B9dZrpUnGwXobxVF+KMPCuM+Yelt7c8xdPvxa1O79E2mCFVjsnU+UxcF9D9 H8e2bAQd/lTBdxZb3ZrRt/X0jh56eankrP7wRxYoSiFBDC6sxjug8H5IfPZclM8020hyDl QCl7i7FWVntiylJ3rvr+SmQiECKdlO4= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1732277049; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CHHPD3jsBWg//9A65GjViuD0QEA9l7CMyBatUt1o7RSGJ+uRgjxwKZZDFS7H9bh/xqFgFh EDhg0IAXtxIzWrM3I+vo+Hub8HqoIOBl2j1h6s+Jo04JpyTOizXELZt0uM/Ye0HFLx0y9h 3urw1PG57zTTWd5e9v6mdeibJMRkpOQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de designates 213.95.11.211 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 2EF7368C4E; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:06:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:06:36 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Shuah Khan Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Theodore Ts'o , Kent Overstreet , Michal Hocko , Dave Chinner , Andrew Morton , Yafang Shao , jack@suse.cz, Christian Brauner , Alexander Viro , Paul Moore , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "conduct@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM Message-ID: <20241122120635.GA25707@lst.de> References: <71b51954-15ba-4e73-baea-584463d43a5c@linuxfoundation.org> <9efc2edf-c6d6-494d-b1bf-64883298150a@linuxfoundation.org> <20241120234759.GA3707860@mit.edu> <20241121042558.GA20176@lst.de> <39e8f416-d136-4307-989a-361bf729e688@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <39e8f416-d136-4307-989a-361bf729e688@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam12 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4C473180008 X-Stat-Signature: nczmejynua5qma3fprzzf1ua9pamzqx6 X-HE-Tag: 1732277147-926992 X-HE-Meta: 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 68vFUlMq W/HEDNlESO/W4XcD4PYxxFkALXM2RHH0wyNnNg7yodajSZbJjIDpnqE1ohcGDagHlua7B6NXf5Av7NqQZC6/2rkKZuTWLMntF1ivX/iYac+nPtQQSYvoeUpBfsTTM9dpiDOqSxtoSXTX8sFuYLGeTc9QSMGxg1gprHM0BW6alKrsVqocGLEaDvy9Zpeqiauy9fDhsNLxkwBdSc4ZzeOSz9cfS0/d14K0PaGtW8BY7vMJz4OY= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 04:53:48PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > I tend to use formal style when I speak on behalf of the Code of Conduct > committee. I would label it as very formal bordering on pedantic. > Would you prefer less formal style in the CoC communication? I would prefer a less passive agressive and more to the point one.