From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B7DD5E15E for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 11:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 162F56B0083; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 06:26:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 113166B0088; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 06:26:13 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id F1C1B6B0089; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 06:26:12 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50D66B0083 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 06:26:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829C2A07C9 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 11:26:12 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82762697598.06.D3507EE Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2444001D for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 11:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=cCus565Z; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 198.175.65.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1731065085; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=/TC+//NnHVReuu0+rhbyd8OwLu/Oqqe5wmlqqV497Vw=; b=efnac1bcd77SdUa+sIwkOueWHy/C56YYX8vNmks0X8K1sdLwhFNk0jSTlU/b2OOAQnufA2 vasHJbtMDYjrl5H82asFJlrdmgxOc6/oZsIHKjZ7Ak1zbsW8VaYF3XO8FFj41JiTzL+Nfr /klEY09dySCpxPqW1N2KebVA/ceVCnU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=cCus565Z; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 198.175.65.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1731065085; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RQVF6GE+rg9OoiN0B4ZIT1B62DRrj+Fndy/bOVApsztFdOKdYU3tV75N7V1p7FH0NPkLdc GwGZRkD04/39P/m9f/qsG2RYyMADEC7/gICzJX1A+Nk+3lGAlmbzvjVrCPA1jPWn9a1JOW IhhBl73M/wOYOSBd/6cWgJJZZ4nhbiw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1731065170; x=1762601170; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0+ge+/Rcb9ZiQmSIKTsHdoYQ1uzdC64gDpNAib8hkwQ=; b=cCus565Zn9xEiTVcKrAe928cFlAfgMXNdkpgBlRsy8c/kHpKPQWH+H9v cCnxvjlJ+HwSeM+zKm9oF5d9sUneQeYdY1uEA86jfvwJCrj852BD+xLpq OLVEmv3l8QnP0oivksFBOgQd9MGVQjO/AptY9vvB1CRqogXUWRF11sI3K Pdu8J2SZr+u7w/s1MOmqa7H+CcT2f2HlXLBzmg1blbbsXLY5xpjyr1kky 2kEpM1AFB7bUF9KgVSlyigFbX6YD8fxkgEUz6HBFjewAYqFziJyjLyz6z Zh9QKLv0v52zy0kyQpAgMbV0c0gpII3oOnjJEaLOJW0SjRH/Ftul02EP+ Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: eN6gfFLzTy+mgbd5EpXoJg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: we5zIvESQayg5AYPPxCbmg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="30799753" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="30799753" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Nov 2024 03:26:08 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BoVfgHG/Sqi/BuIE1Z8Fmw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FZWxUu/5SAy/9TGBziW+lw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,137,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="90652907" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2024 03:26:00 -0800 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t9N7m-000rMS-1T; Fri, 08 Nov 2024 11:25:58 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 19:25:07 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Baolin Wang , akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, ioworker0@gmail.com, da.gomez@samsung.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: shmem: add large folio support for tmpfs Message-ID: <202411081926.LQ3wEK7l-lkp@intel.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6A2444001D X-Stat-Signature: kxmswuhckdrtxndhqwa4idymp39ymr8s X-HE-Tag: 1731065153-522372 X-HE-Meta: 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 KHCSfw/x AyAxXuZ5xHct2eb7swN+fEe11qEh8jZxgoXvtogxvH5vA6UxyIShzjqJ6JcE2peU/S0qGLgd/PutdWPCf8Z3JrQXwbm8xWi2AuaJWCNiAGK9S/Qq8MmbxM2/cdnEiXWPFH8/2I7ORQJGXKCaprYOYqgFe6oXJwFcP2HghHDT/7CLUAyuLv58ON3ccXz74vuZ/BQYbrPHs6E6yFOzPINr7TEsvG7OaliY24IXpSDfp7UeiOlns5ql0NG4Z597DBklajGY0lvcJZNRDf3HNyM61kSRQFOR+VqoRxz1eS/W8ytIppTXgq/0xcEt+Q5cJAD6xbSi5Zr46rRhzwXIkLGPJpk5tlwKoZb2EPdB/H0PgYI/xFRzaJ/JluXVKIpFs706RPV06 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Baolin, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything] [also build test WARNING on next-20241108] [cannot apply to linus/master v6.12-rc6] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Baolin-Wang/mm-factor-out-the-order-calculation-into-a-new-helper/20241108-121545 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e2f4e483f75e54be0654fafb2147822faacac16d.1731038280.git.baolin.wang%40linux.alibaba.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/4] mm: shmem: add large folio support for tmpfs config: x86_64-rhel-8.3 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241108/202411081926.LQ3wEK7l-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241108/202411081926.LQ3wEK7l-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411081926.LQ3wEK7l-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/shmem.c:567: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'write_end' not described in 'shmem_mapping_size_orders' >> mm/shmem.c:567: warning: Excess function parameter 'size' description in 'shmem_mapping_size_orders' vim +567 mm/shmem.c 551 552 /** 553 * shmem_mapping_size_orders - Get allowable folio orders for the given file size. 554 * @mapping: Target address_space. 555 * @index: The page index. 556 * @size: The suggested size of the folio to create. 557 * 558 * This returns a high order for folios (when supported) based on the file size 559 * which the mapping currently allows at the given index. The index is relevant 560 * due to alignment considerations the mapping might have. The returned order 561 * may be less than the size passed. 562 * 563 * Return: The orders. 564 */ 565 static inline unsigned int 566 shmem_mapping_size_orders(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index, loff_t write_end) > 567 { 568 unsigned int order; 569 size_t size; 570 571 if (!mapping_large_folio_support(mapping) || !write_end) 572 return 0; 573 574 /* Calculate the write size based on the write_end */ 575 size = write_end - (index << PAGE_SHIFT); 576 order = filemap_get_order(size); 577 if (!order) 578 return 0; 579 580 /* If we're not aligned, allocate a smaller folio */ 581 if (index & ((1UL << order) - 1)) 582 order = __ffs(index); 583 584 order = min_t(size_t, order, MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER); 585 return order > 0 ? BIT(order + 1) - 1 : 0; 586 } 587 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki