[PATCH v3 1/2] mm: use aligned address in clear_gigantic_page()

[Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>]

In current kernel, hugetlb_no_page() calls folio_zero_user() with the
fault address. Where the fault address may be not aligned with the huge
page size. Then, folio_zero_user() may call clear_gigantic_page() with
the address, while clear_gigantic_page() requires the address to be huge
page size aligned. So, this may cause memory corruption or information
leak, addtional, use more obvious naming 'addr_hint' instead of 'addr'
for clear_gigantic_page().

Fixes: 78fefd04c123 ("mm: memory: convert clear_huge_page() to folio_zero_user()")
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
v3:
- revise patch description, suggested by Huang Ying
- use addr_hint for clear_gigantic_page(), suggested by David
v2: 
- update changelog to clarify the impact, per Andrew

 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 2 +-
 mm/memory.c          | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
index a4441fb77f7c..a5ea006f403e 100644
--- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ static long hugetlbfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset,
 			error = PTR_ERR(folio);
 			goto out;
 		}
-		folio_zero_user(folio, ALIGN_DOWN(addr, hpage_size));
+		folio_zero_user(folio, addr);
 		__folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
 		error = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, mapping, index);
 		if (unlikely(error)) {
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 75c2dfd04f72..84864387f965 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -6815,9 +6815,10 @@ static inline int process_huge_page(
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void clear_gigantic_page(struct folio *folio, unsigned long addr,
+static void clear_gigantic_page(struct folio *folio, unsigned long addr_hint,
 				unsigned int nr_pages)
 {
+	unsigned long addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr_hint, folio_size(folio));
 	int i;
 
 	might_sleep();
-- 
2.27.0