From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: bpf_csum_diff: optimize and homogenize for all archs
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:38:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241023153922.86909-3-puranjay@kernel.org>
Hi Puranjay,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Puranjay-Mohan/net-checksum-move-from32to16-to-generic-header/20241023-234347
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023153922.86909-3-puranjay%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: bpf_csum_diff: optimize and homogenize for all archs
config: i386-randconfig-061-20241025 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241025/202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241025/202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
net/core/filter.c:1423:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@ got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@
net/core/filter.c:1423:39: sparse: expected struct sock_filter const *filter
net/core/filter.c:1423:39: sparse: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
net/core/filter.c:1501:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@ got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@
net/core/filter.c:1501:39: sparse: expected struct sock_filter const *filter
net/core/filter.c:1501:39: sparse: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
net/core/filter.c:2321:45: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr @@ got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh @@
net/core/filter.c:2321:45: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr
net/core/filter.c:2321:45: sparse: got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh
net/core/filter.c:10993:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11000:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11004:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11013:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11017:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xdp_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11029:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11035:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11039:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11045:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11049:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11055:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11059:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11066:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11070:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11076:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11079:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11085:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11088:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11094:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11097:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11103:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11106:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11113:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11116:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11123:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11126:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11132:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11460:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11466:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11668:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:11672:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:1931:43: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1931:43: sparse: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
net/core/filter.c:1931:43: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1934:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1934:36: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old
net/core/filter.c:1934:36: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1934:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1934:42: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new
net/core/filter.c:1934:42: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1937:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1937:36: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1937:36: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1937:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1937:42: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1937:42: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1982:59: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1982:59: sparse: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
net/core/filter.c:1982:59: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1985:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1985:52: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1985:52: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1985:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1985:58: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1985:58: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1988:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1988:52: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1988:52: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1988:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1988:58: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1988:58: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
>> net/core/filter.c:2023:48: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int sum @@ got restricted __wsum @@
net/core/filter.c:2023:48: sparse: expected unsigned int sum
net/core/filter.c:2023:48: sparse: got restricted __wsum
net/core/filter.c:2026:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int sum @@ got restricted __wsum @@
net/core/filter.c:2026:52: sparse: expected unsigned int sum
net/core/filter.c:2026:52: sparse: got restricted __wsum
net/core/filter.c:2029:40: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int sum @@ got restricted __wsum @@
net/core/filter.c:2029:40: sparse: expected unsigned int sum
net/core/filter.c:2029:40: sparse: got restricted __wsum
net/core/filter.c:2031:16: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long long @@ got restricted __wsum [usertype] seed @@
net/core/filter.c:2031:16: sparse: expected unsigned long long
net/core/filter.c:2031:16: sparse: got restricted __wsum [usertype] seed
net/core/filter.c:2053:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long long @@ got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum @@
net/core/filter.c:2053:35: sparse: expected unsigned long long
net/core/filter.c:2053:35: sparse: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum
vim +2023 net/core/filter.c
2009
2010 BPF_CALL_5(bpf_csum_diff, __be32 *, from, u32, from_size,
2011 __be32 *, to, u32, to_size, __wsum, seed)
2012 {
2013 /* This is quite flexible, some examples:
2014 *
2015 * from_size == 0, to_size > 0, seed := csum --> pushing data
2016 * from_size > 0, to_size == 0, seed := csum --> pulling data
2017 * from_size > 0, to_size > 0, seed := 0 --> diffing data
2018 *
2019 * Even for diffing, from_size and to_size don't need to be equal.
2020 */
2021
2022 if (from_size && to_size)
> 2023 return csum_from32to16(csum_sub(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed),
2024 csum_partial(from, from_size, 0)));
2025 if (to_size)
2026 return csum_from32to16(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed));
2027
2028 if (from_size)
2029 return csum_from32to16(~csum_partial(from, from_size, ~seed));
2030
2031 return seed;
2032 }
2033
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-25 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20241023153922.86909-3-puranjay@kernel.org>
2024-10-25 7:38 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-10-25 10:11 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-10-25 11:32 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox