From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: jeffxu@chromium.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org,
oleg@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
jorgelo@chromium.org, sroettger@google.com, ojeda@kernel.org,
adobriyan@gmail.com, anna-maria@linutronix.de,
mark.rutland@arm.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, Jason@zx2c4.com,
deller@gmx.de, rdunlap@infradead.org, davem@davemloft.net,
hch@lst.de, peterx@redhat.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, gerg@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, mhocko@suse.com, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com,
peterz@infradead.org, ardb@google.com, enh@google.com,
rientjes@google.com, groeck@chromium.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] exec: seal system mappings
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:26:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410161424.FA6DBA7D91@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014215022.68530-2-jeffxu@google.com>
(I don't think this needs "RFC" any more)
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:50:20PM +0000, jeffxu@chromium.org wrote:
> From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>
>
> Seal vdso, vvar, sigpage, uprobes and vsyscall.
>
> Those mappings are readonly or executable only, sealing can protect
> them from ever changing during the life time of the process. For
> complete descriptions of memory sealing, please see mseal.rst [1].
>
> System mappings such as vdso, vvar, and sigpage (for arm) are
> generated by the kernel during program initialization. These mappings
> are designated as non-writable, and sealing them will prevent them
> from ever becoming writeable.
>
> Unlike the aforementioned mappings, the uprobe mapping is not
> established during program startup. However, its lifetime is the same
> as the process's lifetime [2], thus sealable.
>
> The vdso, vvar, sigpage, and uprobe mappings all invoke the
> _install_special_mapping() function. As no other mappings utilize this
> function, it is logical to incorporate sealing logic within
> _install_special_mapping(). This approach avoids the necessity of
> modifying code across various architecture-specific implementations.
>
> The vsyscall mapping, which has its own initialization function, is
> sealed in the XONLY case, it seems to be the most common and secure
> case of using vsyscall.
>
> It is important to note that the CHECKPOINT_RESTORE feature (CRIU) may
> alter the mapping of vdso, vvar, and sigpage during restore
> operations. Consequently, this feature cannot be universally enabled
> across all systems. To address this, a kernel configuration option has
> been introduced to enable or disable this functionality. Note, uprobe
> is always sealed and not controlled by this kernel configuration.
>
> [1] Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CABi2SkU9BRUnqf70-nksuMCQ+yyiWjo3fM4XkRkL-NrCZxYAyg@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>
> ---
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 10 ++++
> arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c | 9 +++-
> fs/exec.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 2 +-
> mm/mmap.c | 1 +
> security/Kconfig | 26 +++++++++
> 7 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index e7bfe1bde49e..02e5eb23d76f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -1538,6 +1538,16 @@
> Permit 'security.evm' to be updated regardless of
> current integrity status.
>
> + exec.seal_system_mappings = [KNL]
> + Format: { never | always }
> + Seal system mappings: vdso, vvar, sigpage, uprobes,
> + vsyscall.
> + This overwrites KCONFIG CONFIG_SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS_*
> + - 'never': never seal system mappings.
> + - 'always': always seal system mappings.
> + If not specified or invalid, default is the KCONFIG value.
> + This option has no effect if CONFIG_64BIT=n
> +
Any reason for "always"/"never" instead of the more traditional y/n
enabled/disabled, etc?
Otherwise, this all makes sense to me.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-16 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-14 21:50 [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] " jeffxu
2024-10-14 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] exec: " jeffxu
2024-10-16 21:26 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-10-16 22:06 ` Jeff Xu
2024-10-17 3:56 ` Jeff Xu
2024-10-17 1:10 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-17 3:43 ` Jeff Xu
2024-10-17 8:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-10-17 16:12 ` Jeff Xu
2024-10-17 16:01 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-11-11 19:10 ` Jeff Xu
2024-11-11 22:35 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-11-13 21:38 ` Jeff Xu
2024-10-16 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] " Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-17 0:58 ` Jeff Xu
2024-10-17 2:03 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-11-11 18:25 ` Jeff Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202410161424.FA6DBA7D91@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=ardb@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=enh@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gerg@kernel.org \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jeffxu@chromium.org \
--cc=jorgelo@chromium.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sroettger@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox