linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chenqiwu <qiwuchen55@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: "qiwu.chen" <qiwuchen55@gmail.com>,
	corbet@lwn.net, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	paulmck@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: show signal info for global init
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:54:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240925035440.GA2941@rlk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240924183634.GB17395@redhat.com>

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 08:36:35PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 
> So what does this patch try to do? Note that unhandled_signal(tsk) returns true
> if is_global_init(tsk).
> 
> So it seems that this patch just tries to bypass the show_unhandled_signals and
> __ratelimit() checks? Or what?
> 
Yes, this patch just try to bypass the show_unhandled_signals and
__ratelimit() checks for the global init.

> 
> OTOH. The is_global_init() check in unhandled_signal() (which predates the git
> history) doesn't look right to me. If init has a handler for, say, SIGSEGV, why
> should the kernel complain? I need to recheck this logic...
> 
I think the orignal logic is the signal sent to the global init is
regarded as unhandled becuase it has SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE feature.

Thanks
Qiwu


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-25  3:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-24  7:43 [PATCH v4 1/2] panic: add option to dump task maps info in panic_print qiwu.chen
2024-09-24  7:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: show signal info for global init qiwu.chen
2024-09-24 18:36   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-25  3:54     ` chenqiwu [this message]
2024-09-25 12:05       ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-26 10:12         ` chenqiwu
2024-09-24 11:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] panic: add option to dump task maps info in panic_print Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-25  8:27   ` chenqiwu
2024-09-25 12:19     ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-26  3:30       ` chenqiwu
2024-09-24 15:06 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-24 15:06 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-01 11:23 ` Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240925035440.GA2941@rlk \
    --to=qiwuchen55@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox