Re: [PATCH 0/4] cleanup maple_alloc related functions

[Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 04:03:35PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 12:39:50PM GMT, Wei Yang wrote:
>> Patch 1/2: some fields of the maple_alloc is not necessary to change, so we
>>            can skip some operations
>> Patch 3: a valid alloc check could be hide in current code, so we don't need
>>          to do a separate check
>> Patch 4: found on rare case where allocation would fail even has enough
>>          memory
>>
>> Wei Yang (4):
>>   maple_tree: clear request_count for new allocated one
>>   maple_tree: total is not changed for nomem_one case
>>   maple_tree: simplify mas_push_node()
>>   maple_tree: fix potential allocation failure even has memory
>>
>>  lib/maple_tree.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>
>
>Andrew - Liam is away at the moment - could we hold off on taking this
>series to unstable until he's back and had a chance to review please?
>
>It may be best to avoid taking maple tree changes other than urgent bug
>fixes or the like until his return also.
>
>Wei - please hold off on series like this until Liam's had a chance to
>reply to this thread. Thanks!

Sure, let me know when it is ok.

BTW, I don't see Andrew has taken it in unstable. Do I miss the mail?

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me