From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] mm: do not export const kfree and kstrdup variants
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:56:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240924065653.GQ38742@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZvJfhDrv-eArtU8Y@infradead.org>
On (24/09/23 23:43), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 02:08:37PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Both kfree_const() and kstrdup_const() use __start_rodata
> > and __end_rodata, which do not work for modules. This is
> > especially important for kfree_const(). Stop exporting
> > these functions, as they cannot be used in the modules.
>
> Well, they do work when called from modules, they just don't work
> on constant data that is in modules. There's also plenty of
> existing callers in modules.
>
> So just unexporting them is going to break. The API is kinda
> horrible, but an implementation to check for constants in modules
> would also be quite horrible. So I don't have a good answer here,
> but simply unexporting them is not going to cut it.
Totally agree with all the points, I haven't looked at how
popular that API was before sending out the patch. Is there
some sort of "built time const" but for strings that we, perhaps,
can add to kfree_const() (and make kfree_const() always inline)?
So that we can turn this
str = "boom";
...
kfree_const(str);
into a safe scenario for modules.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-24 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-24 5:08 Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-09-24 6:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-09-24 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 6:56 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2024-09-24 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 19:45 ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-09-24 17:41 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240924065653.GQ38742@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox