From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
oleg@redhat.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, surenb@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mjguzik@gmail.com,
brauner@kernel.org, jannh@google.com,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm: introduce mmap_lock_speculation_{start|end}
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 22:12:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240906051205.530219-2-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240906051205.530219-1-andrii@kernel.org>
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Add helper functions to speculatively perform operations without
read-locking mmap_lock, expecting that mmap_lock will not be
write-locked and mm is not modified from under us.
A few will-it-scale ([0]) bechmarks were run with and without the
changes in this patch on a beefy server. The test script below was used.
Most of background activity on the server was stopped, but there could
still be some sporadic sources of noise. And frankly, will-it-scale
benchmarks themselves aren't 100% noise-free and do fluctuate somewhat.
Also malloc1 benchmark was getting stuck for some reason, so it was
skipped from benchmarks. But I think it was still useful as a bit of
sanity check, but take all of them with a grain of salt.
Benchmark script:
# cat will_it_scale.sh
#!/bin/bash
set -eufo pipefail
for b in page_fault1 page_fault2 page_fault3 malloc2; do
for p in 40; do
echo BENCH $b CPU$p $(will-it-scale/${b}_threads -m -t$p -s60 | grep average)
done;
done;
Before (w/o this patch)
=======================
BENCH page_fault1 CPU40 average:5403940
BENCH page_fault2 CPU40 average:5019159
BENCH page_fault3 CPU40 average:971057
BENCH malloc2 CPU40 average:1364730680
After (w/ this patch)
=====================
BENCH page_fault1 CPU40 average:5485892
BENCH page_fault2 CPU40 average:5047923
BENCH page_fault3 CPU40 average:982953
BENCH malloc2 CPU40 average:1361339890
Results seem to be within the noise of measurements, but perhaps mm
folks might have better benchmarks to try.
[0] https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/mm_types.h | 3 +++
include/linux/mmap_lock.h | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
kernel/fork.c | 3 ---
3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 485424979254..d5e3f907eea4 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -876,6 +876,9 @@ struct mm_struct {
* Roughly speaking, incrementing the sequence number is
* equivalent to releasing locks on VMAs; reading the sequence
* number can be part of taking a read lock on a VMA.
+ * Incremented every time mmap_lock is write-locked/unlocked.
+ * Initialized to 0, therefore odd values indicate mmap_lock
+ * is write-locked and even values that it's released.
*
* Can be modified under write mmap_lock using RELEASE
* semantics.
diff --git a/include/linux/mmap_lock.h b/include/linux/mmap_lock.h
index de9dc20b01ba..5410ce741d75 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmap_lock.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmap_lock.h
@@ -71,15 +71,12 @@ static inline void mmap_assert_write_locked(const struct mm_struct *mm)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
-/*
- * Drop all currently-held per-VMA locks.
- * This is called from the mmap_lock implementation directly before releasing
- * a write-locked mmap_lock (or downgrading it to read-locked).
- * This should normally NOT be called manually from other places.
- * If you want to call this manually anyway, keep in mind that this will release
- * *all* VMA write locks, including ones from further up the stack.
- */
-static inline void vma_end_write_all(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static inline void init_mm_lock_seq(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ mm->mm_lock_seq = 0;
+}
+
+static inline void inc_mm_lock_seq(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mmap_assert_write_locked(mm);
/*
@@ -91,19 +88,52 @@ static inline void vma_end_write_all(struct mm_struct *mm)
*/
smp_store_release(&mm->mm_lock_seq, mm->mm_lock_seq + 1);
}
+
+static inline bool mmap_lock_speculation_start(struct mm_struct *mm, int *seq)
+{
+ /* Pairs with RELEASE semantics in inc_mm_lock_seq(). */
+ *seq = smp_load_acquire(&mm->mm_lock_seq);
+ /* Allow speculation if mmap_lock is not write-locked */
+ return (*seq & 1) == 0;
+}
+
+static inline bool mmap_lock_speculation_end(struct mm_struct *mm, int seq)
+{
+ /* Pairs with RELEASE semantics in inc_mm_lock_seq(). */
+ return seq == smp_load_acquire(&mm->mm_lock_seq);
+}
+
#else
-static inline void vma_end_write_all(struct mm_struct *mm) {}
+static inline void init_mm_lock_seq(struct mm_struct *mm) {}
+static inline void inc_mm_lock_seq(struct mm_struct *mm) {}
+static inline bool mmap_lock_speculation_start(struct mm_struct *mm, int *seq) { return false; }
+static inline bool mmap_lock_speculation_end(struct mm_struct *mm, int seq) { return false; }
#endif
+/*
+ * Drop all currently-held per-VMA locks.
+ * This is called from the mmap_lock implementation directly before releasing
+ * a write-locked mmap_lock (or downgrading it to read-locked).
+ * This should normally NOT be called manually from other places.
+ * If you want to call this manually anyway, keep in mind that this will release
+ * *all* VMA write locks, including ones from further up the stack.
+ */
+static inline void vma_end_write_all(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ inc_mm_lock_seq(mm);
+}
+
static inline void mmap_init_lock(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
init_rwsem(&mm->mmap_lock);
+ init_mm_lock_seq(mm);
}
static inline void mmap_write_lock(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
__mmap_lock_trace_start_locking(mm, true);
down_write(&mm->mmap_lock);
+ inc_mm_lock_seq(mm);
__mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned(mm, true, true);
}
@@ -111,6 +141,7 @@ static inline void mmap_write_lock_nested(struct mm_struct *mm, int subclass)
{
__mmap_lock_trace_start_locking(mm, true);
down_write_nested(&mm->mmap_lock, subclass);
+ inc_mm_lock_seq(mm);
__mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned(mm, true, true);
}
@@ -120,6 +151,8 @@ static inline int mmap_write_lock_killable(struct mm_struct *mm)
__mmap_lock_trace_start_locking(mm, true);
ret = down_write_killable(&mm->mmap_lock);
+ if (!ret)
+ inc_mm_lock_seq(mm);
__mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned(mm, true, ret == 0);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 18bdc87209d0..c44b71d354ee 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1259,9 +1259,6 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
seqcount_init(&mm->write_protect_seq);
mmap_init_lock(mm);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mm->mmlist);
-#ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
- mm->mm_lock_seq = 0;
-#endif
mm_pgtables_bytes_init(mm);
mm->map_count = 0;
mm->locked_vm = 0;
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-06 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-06 5:12 [PATCH 0/2] uprobes,mm: speculative lockless VMA-to-uprobe lookup Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-06 5:12 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2024-09-09 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: introduce mmap_lock_speculation_{start|end} Jann Horn
2024-09-10 2:09 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-09-10 15:31 ` Jann Horn
2024-09-11 21:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-11 21:48 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-09-12 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-09-12 21:04 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-09-12 22:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-12 22:24 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-09-12 22:52 ` Jann Horn
2024-09-24 17:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-24 18:00 ` Jann Horn
2024-09-06 5:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] uprobes: add speculative lockless VMA-to-inode-to-uprobe resolution Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-08 1:22 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-09-09 1:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-09 13:12 ` Jann Horn
2024-09-09 21:29 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-10 15:39 ` Jann Horn
2024-09-10 20:56 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-10 16:32 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-09-10 20:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-12 11:17 ` Christian Brauner
2024-09-12 17:54 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-15 15:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-17 8:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-10 16:06 ` [PATCH 0/2] uprobes,mm: speculative lockless VMA-to-uprobe lookup Jann Horn
2024-09-10 17:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-10 18:13 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240906051205.530219-2-andrii@kernel.org \
--to=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox