linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: usamaarif642@gmail.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, baohua@kernel.org,
	cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com, corbet@lwn.net, david@redhat.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, riel@surriel.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	rppt@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
	willy@infradead.org, yuzhao@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: Introduce a pageflag for partially mapped folios
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 11:05:33 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240814230533.54938-1-21cnbao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88d411c5-6d66-4d41-ae86-e0f943e5fb91@gmail.com>


On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 12:37 AM Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
> >>>>
> >>>> -void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio)
> >>>> +void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped)
> >>>>  {
> >>>>         struct deferred_split *ds_queue = get_deferred_split_queue(folio);
> >>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> >>>> @@ -3485,14 +3487,17 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio)
> >>>>         if (folio_test_swapcache(folio))
> >>>>                 return;
> >>>>
> >>>> -       if (!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list))
> >>>> -               return;
> >>>> -
> >>>>         spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
> >>>> +       if (partially_mapped)
> >>>> +               folio_set_partially_mapped(folio);
> >>>> +       else
> >>>> +               folio_clear_partially_mapped(folio);
> >>>>         if (list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
> >>>> -               if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> >>>> -                       count_vm_event(THP_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE);
> >>>> -               count_mthp_stat(folio_order(folio), MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_DEFERRED);
> >>>> +               if (partially_mapped) {
> >>>> +                       if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> >>>> +                               count_vm_event(THP_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE);
> >>>> +                       count_mthp_stat(folio_order(folio), MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_DEFERRED);
> >>>
> >>> This code completely broke MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_DEFERRED for PMD_ORDER. It
> >>> added the folio to the deferred_list as entirely_mapped
> >>> (partially_mapped == false).
> >>> However, when partially_mapped becomes true, there's no opportunity to
> >>> add it again
> >>> as it has been there on the list. Are you consistently seeing the counter for
> >>> PMD_ORDER as 0?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Ah I see it, this should fix it?
> >>
> >> -void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio)
> >> +/* partially_mapped=false won't clear PG_partially_mapped folio flag */
> >> +void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped)
> >>  {
> >>         struct deferred_split *ds_queue = get_deferred_split_queue(folio);
> >>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> >> @@ -3485,14 +3488,14 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio)
> >>         if (folio_test_swapcache(folio))
> >>                 return;
> >>
> >> -       if (!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list))
> >> -               return;
> >> -
> >>         spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
> >> -       if (list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
> >> +       if (partially_mapped) {
> >> +               folio_set_partially_mapped(folio);
> >>                 if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> >>                         count_vm_event(THP_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE);
> >>                 count_mthp_stat(folio_order(folio), MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_DEFERRED);
> >> +       }
> >> +       if (list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
> >>                 list_add_tail(&folio->_deferred_list, &ds_queue->split_queue);
> >>                 ds_queue->split_queue_len++;
> >>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> >>
> >
> > not enough. as deferred_split_folio(true) won't be called if folio has been
> > deferred_list in __folio_remove_rmap():
> >
> >         if (partially_mapped && folio_test_anon(folio) &&
> >             list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list))
> >                 deferred_split_folio(folio, true);
> >
> > so you will still see 0.
> >
>
> ah yes, Thanks.
>
> So below diff over the current v3 series should work for all cases:
>
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index b4d72479330d..482e3ab60911 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3483,6 +3483,7 @@ void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio)
>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
>  }
>
> +/* partially_mapped=false won't clear PG_partially_mapped folio flag */
>  void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped)
>  {
>         struct deferred_split *ds_queue = get_deferred_split_queue(folio);
> @@ -3515,16 +3516,16 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped)
>                 return;
>
>         spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
> -       if (partially_mapped)
> +       if (partially_mapped) {
>                 folio_set_partially_mapped(folio);
> -       else
> -               folio_clear_partially_mapped(folio);
> +               if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> +                       count_vm_event(THP_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE);
> +               count_mthp_stat(folio_order(folio), MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_DEFERRED);
> +       } else {
> +               /* partially mapped folios cannont become partially unmapped */
> +               VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_partially_mapped(folio), folio);
> +       }
>         if (list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
> -               if (partially_mapped) {
> -                       if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> -                               count_vm_event(THP_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE);
> -                       count_mthp_stat(folio_order(folio), MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_DEFERRED);
> -               }
>                 list_add_tail(&folio->_deferred_list, &ds_queue->split_queue);
>                 ds_queue->split_queue_len++;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index 9ad558c2bad0..4c330635aa4e 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1578,7 +1578,7 @@ static __always_inline void __folio_remove_rmap(struct folio *folio,
>          * Check partially_mapped first to ensure it is a large folio.
>          */
>         if (partially_mapped && folio_test_anon(folio) &&
> -           list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list))
> +           !folio_test_partially_mapped(folio))
>                 deferred_split_folio(folio, true);
>
>         __folio_mod_stat(folio, -nr, -nr_pmdmapped);
>

This is an improvement, but there's still an issue. Two or more threads can
execute deferred_split_folio() simultaneously, which could lead to
DEFERRED_SPLIT being added multiple times. We should double-check
the status after acquiring the spinlock.

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index f401ceded697..3d247826fb95 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3607,10 +3607,12 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped)
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
 	if (partially_mapped) {
-		folio_set_partially_mapped(folio);
-		if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
-			count_vm_event(THP_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE);
-		count_mthp_stat(folio_order(folio), MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_DEFERRED);
+		if (!folio_test_partially_mapped(folio)) {
+			folio_set_partially_mapped(folio);
+			if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
+				count_vm_event(THP_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE);
+			count_mthp_stat(folio_order(folio), MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_DEFERRED);
+		}
 	} else {
 		/* partially mapped folios cannont become partially unmapped */
 		VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_partially_mapped(folio), folio);


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-14 23:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-13 12:02 [PATCH v3 0/6] mm: split underutilized THPs Usama Arif
2024-08-13 12:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] mm: free zapped tail pages when splitting isolated thp Usama Arif
2024-08-15 18:47   ` Kairui Song
2024-08-15 19:16     ` Usama Arif
2024-08-16 16:55       ` Kairui Song
2024-08-16 17:02         ` Usama Arif
2024-08-16 18:11           ` Kairui Song
2024-08-13 12:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage " Usama Arif
2024-08-13 12:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] mm: selftest to verify zero-filled pages are mapped to zeropage Usama Arif
2024-08-13 12:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: Introduce a pageflag for partially mapped folios Usama Arif
2024-08-14  3:30   ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-14 10:20     ` Usama Arif
2024-08-14 10:44   ` Barry Song
2024-08-14 10:52     ` Barry Song
2024-08-14 11:11     ` Usama Arif
2024-08-14 11:20       ` Barry Song
2024-08-14 11:26         ` Barry Song
2024-08-14 11:30         ` Usama Arif
2024-08-14 11:10   ` Barry Song
2024-08-14 11:20     ` Usama Arif
2024-08-14 11:23       ` Barry Song
2024-08-14 12:36         ` Usama Arif
2024-08-14 23:05           ` Barry Song [this message]
2024-08-15 15:25             ` Usama Arif
2024-08-15 23:30               ` Andrew Morton
2024-08-16  2:50                 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-15 16:33   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-15 17:10     ` Usama Arif
2024-08-15 21:06       ` Barry Song
2024-08-15 21:08       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-16 15:44   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-16 16:08     ` Usama Arif
2024-08-16 16:28       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-16 16:41         ` Usama Arif
2024-08-13 12:02 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] mm: split underutilized THPs Usama Arif
2024-08-13 12:02 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] mm: add sysfs entry to disable splitting " Usama Arif
2024-08-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] mm: split " Andi Kleen
2024-08-14 10:13   ` Usama Arif
2024-08-18  5:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2024-08-18  7:45   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19  2:38     ` Usama Arif
2024-08-19  2:36   ` Usama Arif

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240814230533.54938-1-21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox