From: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 3246/3984] kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:303:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 12:38:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240811070859.GA977168@neeraj.linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com>
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 03:55:37AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head: 61c01d2e181adfba02fe09764f9fca1de2be0dbe
> commit: 628ea78b8d1057d4709b38730a1f181e9607ad23 [3246/3984] rcuscale: Print detailed grace-period and barrier diagnostics
> config: x86_64-randconfig-074-20240809 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240811/202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240811/202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com/
>
> Note: the linux-next/master HEAD 61c01d2e181adfba02fe09764f9fca1de2be0dbe builds fine.
> It may have been fixed somewhere.
>
Thanks for reporting this! I have fixed the order of below 2 commits here
[1]
cb4b877e9d5f rcu/tasks: Add detailed grace-period and barrier diagnostics
d9562675f501 rcuscale: Print detailed grace-period and barrier diagnostics
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rcu/linux.git/log/?h=next
- Neeraj
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:303:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 303 | rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
> | ^
> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:303:2: note: did you mean 'srcu_torture_stats_print'?
> include/linux/srcutree.h:192:6: note: 'srcu_torture_stats_print' declared here
> 192 | void srcu_torture_stats_print(struct srcu_struct *ssp, char *tt, char *tf);
> | ^
> >> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:347:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_rude_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 347 | rcu_tasks_rude_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
> | ^
> >> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:393:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_trace_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 393 | rcu_tasks_trace_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
> | ^
> 3 errors generated.
>
>
> vim +/rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print +303 kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
>
> 300
> 301 static void rcu_tasks_scale_stats(void)
> 302 {
> > 303 rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
> 304 }
> 305
> 306 static struct rcu_scale_ops tasks_ops = {
> 307 .ptype = RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR,
> 308 .init = rcu_sync_scale_init,
> 309 .readlock = tasks_scale_read_lock,
> 310 .readunlock = tasks_scale_read_unlock,
> 311 .get_gp_seq = rcu_no_completed,
> 312 .gp_diff = rcu_seq_diff,
> 313 .async = call_rcu_tasks,
> 314 .gp_barrier = rcu_barrier_tasks,
> 315 .sync = synchronize_rcu_tasks,
> 316 .exp_sync = synchronize_rcu_tasks,
> 317 .rso_gp_kthread = get_rcu_tasks_gp_kthread,
> 318 .stats = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) ? NULL : rcu_tasks_scale_stats,
> 319 .name = "tasks"
> 320 };
> 321
> 322 #define TASKS_OPS &tasks_ops,
> 323
> 324 #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> 325
> 326 #define TASKS_OPS
> 327
> 328 #endif // #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> 329
> 330 #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
> 331
> 332 /*
> 333 * Definitions for RCU-tasks-rude scalability testing.
> 334 */
> 335
> 336 static int tasks_rude_scale_read_lock(void)
> 337 {
> 338 return 0;
> 339 }
> 340
> 341 static void tasks_rude_scale_read_unlock(int idx)
> 342 {
> 343 }
> 344
> 345 static void rcu_tasks_rude_scale_stats(void)
> 346 {
> > 347 rcu_tasks_rude_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
> 348 }
> 349
> 350 static struct rcu_scale_ops tasks_rude_ops = {
> 351 .ptype = RCU_TASKS_RUDE_FLAVOR,
> 352 .init = rcu_sync_scale_init,
> 353 .readlock = tasks_rude_scale_read_lock,
> 354 .readunlock = tasks_rude_scale_read_unlock,
> 355 .get_gp_seq = rcu_no_completed,
> 356 .gp_diff = rcu_seq_diff,
> 357 .async = call_rcu_tasks_rude,
> 358 .gp_barrier = rcu_barrier_tasks_rude,
> 359 .sync = synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude,
> 360 .exp_sync = synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude,
> 361 .rso_gp_kthread = get_rcu_tasks_rude_gp_kthread,
> 362 .stats = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) ? NULL : rcu_tasks_rude_scale_stats,
> 363 .name = "tasks-rude"
> 364 };
> 365
> 366 #define TASKS_RUDE_OPS &tasks_rude_ops,
> 367
> 368 #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
> 369
> 370 #define TASKS_RUDE_OPS
> 371
> 372 #endif // #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
> 373
> 374 #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
> 375
> 376 /*
> 377 * Definitions for RCU-tasks-trace scalability testing.
> 378 */
> 379
> 380 static int tasks_trace_scale_read_lock(void)
> 381 {
> 382 rcu_read_lock_trace();
> 383 return 0;
> 384 }
> 385
> 386 static void tasks_trace_scale_read_unlock(int idx)
> 387 {
> 388 rcu_read_unlock_trace();
> 389 }
> 390
> 391 static void rcu_tasks_trace_scale_stats(void)
> 392 {
> > 393 rcu_tasks_trace_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
> 394 }
> 395
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-11 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-10 19:55 kernel test robot
2024-08-11 7:08 ` Neeraj Upadhyay [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240811070859.GA977168@neeraj.linux \
--to=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox