From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Andrey Konovalov" <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
<kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [linux-next:master] [slub] d543c8fb9c: BUG_filp(Not_tainted):Bulk_free_expected#objects_but_found
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:27:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202407311019.5ea52390-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
hi, Jann Horn,
we reported "WARNING:possible_circular_locking_dependency_detected"
issue upon v3 of this patch in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202407291014.2ead1e72-oliver.sang@intel.com/
several days ago.
at that time, you said that real issue should be something like
"BUG filp (Not tainted): Bulk free expected 1 objects but found 2"
and you will send a fix.
now we noticed this patch in in linux-next/master, but not sure the version.
we found there are still similar issues so just send report to you FYI.
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed "BUG_filp(Not_tainted):Bulk_free_expected#objects_but_found" on:
commit: d543c8fb9c4caa95cd2799b9d3b6f6354140f4f4 ("slub: introduce CONFIG_SLUB_RCU_DEBUG")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
[test failed on linux-next/master cd19ac2f903276b820f5d0d89de0c896c27036ed]
in testcase: rcutorture
version:
with following parameters:
runtime: 300s
test: cpuhotplug
torture_type: srcud
compiler: gcc-13
test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 16G
(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202407311019.5ea52390-lkp@intel.com
[ 243.911590][ T0] masked ExtINT on CPU#1
[ 244.087218][ T9] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
[ 244.154988][ T435] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x1
[ 244.155553][ T0] masked ExtINT on CPU#1
[ 244.226610][ C1] =============================================================================
[ 244.227574][ C1] BUG filp (Not tainted): Bulk free expected 1 objects but found 2
[ 244.227574][ C1]
[ 244.228097][ C1] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 244.228097][ C1]
[ 244.228665][ C1] Slab 0xffffea0005dac500 objects=23 used=23 fp=0x0000000000000000 flags=0x8000000000000040(head|zone=2)
[ 244.229241][ C1] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 22 Comm: cpuhp/1 Not tainted 6.10.0-12959-gd543c8fb9c4c #1
[ 244.229725][ C1] Call Trace:
[ 244.229909][ C1] <IRQ>
[ 244.230069][ C1] dump_stack_lvl (kbuild/src/consumer/lib/dump_stack.c:122)
[ 244.230337][ C1] slab_err (kbuild/src/consumer/mm/slub.c:1149)
[ 244.230606][ C1] ? check_object (kbuild/src/consumer/mm/slub.c:1293 kbuild/src/consumer/mm/slub.c:1391)
[ 244.230925][ C1] free_debug_processing (kbuild/src/consumer/mm/slub.c:3378)
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240731/202407311019.5ea52390-lkp@intel.com
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-31 5:27 kernel test robot [this message]
2024-07-31 11:50 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202407311019.5ea52390-lkp@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox