linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Pei Li <peili.dev@gmail.com>, David Wang <00107082@163.com>,
	Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/x86/pat: Only untrack the pfn range if unmap region
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:44:12 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240723214412.GQ3371438@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f48c1a91-8ed1-447d-93ad-449f28753c5c@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 11:36:51PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> I wonder if we could just let relevant users do the PAT handling manually:
> I'm also not sure how many remap_pfn_range users end up triggering VM_PAT
> code although they don't really have to (just because they happen to cover a
> full VMA)?
> 
> One nasty thing is fork(), I was wondering if relevant users really rely on
> that or if we could force these VMAs to simply not get copied during fork.
> During fork() we have to "duplicate" the reservation ...

I admit I barely understand what x86 uses this PAT stuff for -
allowing WC mappings is part of it?

If yes, then RDMA would expect WC PFN MAP VMAs to copy their WCness
during fork..

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-23 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-12 14:42 Peter Xu
2024-07-13  1:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-13  3:36 ` David Wang
2024-07-14 10:59 ` David Wang
2024-07-14 18:27   ` [PATCH] " David Hildenbrand
2024-07-15 15:03     ` Peter Xu
2024-07-17 14:14       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-17 16:27         ` Peter Xu
2024-07-15  7:08 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-15 14:29   ` Peter Xu
2024-07-16  9:13     ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-16 19:01       ` Peter Xu
2024-07-17  1:38         ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-17 14:15           ` Peter Xu
2024-07-18  1:50             ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-18 14:03               ` Peter Xu
2024-07-18 23:18                 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-19  8:28                   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 14:13                     ` Peter Xu
2024-07-22  6:49                       ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-22 13:52                         ` Peter Xu
2024-07-22  6:43                     ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-22  9:17                       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-23 20:27                         ` Peter Xu
2024-07-23 21:36                           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-23 21:44                             ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-07-24  8:53                               ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-17 14:17         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-17 16:30           ` Peter Xu
2024-07-17 16:31             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-17 18:10               ` Peter Xu
2024-07-17 16:32             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-17 18:12               ` Peter Xu
2024-07-20  2:18 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-07-22 15:15   ` Peter Xu
2024-07-22 20:22     ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-07-22 21:17       ` Peter Xu
2024-07-23 10:12         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-23 17:58           ` Liam R. Howlett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240723214412.GQ3371438@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=00107082@163.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peili.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=spasswolf@web.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox