From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/6] mm, slab: always maintain per-node slab and object count
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:29:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240715-b4-slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v1-2-46b2984c2205@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240715-b4-slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v1-0-46b2984c2205@suse.cz>
Currently SLUB counts per-node slabs and total objects only with
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG, in order to minimize overhead. However, the detection
in __kmem_cache_shutdown() whether there are no outstanding object
relies on the per-node slab count (node_nr_slabs()) so it may be
unreliable without CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG. Thus we might be failing to warn
about such situations, and instead destroy a cache while leaving its
slab(s) around (due to a buggy slab user creating such a scenario, not
in normal operation).
We will also need node_nr_slabs() to be reliable in the following work
to gracefully handle kmem_cache_destroy() with kfree_rcu() objects in
flight. Thus make the counting of per-node slabs and objects
unconditional.
Note that CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is the default anyway, and the counting is
done only when allocating or freeing a slab page, so even in
!CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG configs the overhead should be negligible.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
mm/slub.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 829a1f08e8a2..aa4d80109c49 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -426,9 +426,9 @@ struct kmem_cache_node {
spinlock_t list_lock;
unsigned long nr_partial;
struct list_head partial;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
atomic_long_t nr_slabs;
atomic_long_t total_objects;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
struct list_head full;
#endif
};
@@ -438,6 +438,26 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache_node *get_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node)
return s->node[node];
}
+static inline unsigned long node_nr_slabs(struct kmem_cache_node *n)
+{
+ return atomic_long_read(&n->nr_slabs);
+}
+
+static inline void inc_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node, int objects)
+{
+ struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
+
+ atomic_long_inc(&n->nr_slabs);
+ atomic_long_add(objects, &n->total_objects);
+}
+static inline void dec_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node, int objects)
+{
+ struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
+
+ atomic_long_dec(&n->nr_slabs);
+ atomic_long_sub(objects, &n->total_objects);
+}
+
/*
* Iterator over all nodes. The body will be executed for each node that has
* a kmem_cache_node structure allocated (which is true for all online nodes)
@@ -1511,26 +1531,6 @@ static void remove_full(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n, struct
list_del(&slab->slab_list);
}
-static inline unsigned long node_nr_slabs(struct kmem_cache_node *n)
-{
- return atomic_long_read(&n->nr_slabs);
-}
-
-static inline void inc_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node, int objects)
-{
- struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
-
- atomic_long_inc(&n->nr_slabs);
- atomic_long_add(objects, &n->total_objects);
-}
-static inline void dec_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node, int objects)
-{
- struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
-
- atomic_long_dec(&n->nr_slabs);
- atomic_long_sub(objects, &n->total_objects);
-}
-
/* Object debug checks for alloc/free paths */
static void setup_object_debug(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
{
@@ -1871,13 +1871,6 @@ slab_flags_t kmem_cache_flags(slab_flags_t flags, const char *name)
#define disable_higher_order_debug 0
-static inline unsigned long node_nr_slabs(struct kmem_cache_node *n)
- { return 0; }
-static inline void inc_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node,
- int objects) {}
-static inline void dec_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node,
- int objects) {}
-
#ifndef CONFIG_SLUB_TINY
static bool freelist_corrupted(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
void **freelist, void *nextfree)
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-15 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-15 20:29 [PATCH RFC 0/6] mm, slub: handle pending kfree_rcu() in kmem_cache_destroy() Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] mm, slab: make caches with refcount of 0 unmergeable Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-21 2:36 ` David Rientjes
2024-07-15 20:29 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2024-07-21 2:37 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] mm, slab: always maintain per-node slab and object count David Rientjes
2024-07-22 14:16 ` Xiongwei Song
2024-07-26 10:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] mm, slab: unlink sysfs and debugfs immediately Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] mm, slab: simplify kmem_cache_release() Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] mm, slab: asynchronously destroy caches with outstanding objects Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] kunit, slub: add test_kfree_rcu() Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-21 2:39 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] mm, slub: handle pending kfree_rcu() in kmem_cache_destroy() David Rientjes
2024-07-22 6:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240715-b4-slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v1-2-46b2984c2205@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox