From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/6] mm, slab: make caches with refcount of 0 unmergeable
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:29:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240715-b4-slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v1-1-46b2984c2205@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240715-b4-slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v1-0-46b2984c2205@suse.cz>
Slab caches with refcount 0 are in the process of being destroyed so
it's undesirable for new caches to attempt merging with them. A
synchronous destruction happens under slab_mutex thus excluding
concurrent cache creation and merging. Full destruction of
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU caches might be delayed, but the cache is still
taken off the slab_caches list immediately, thus unreachable by cache
creation.
However a cache where __kmem_cache_shutdown() fails because it contains
objects that were not freed (due to a bug in the cache user) will be
left on the slab_caches list and might be considered for merging.
Also the following patches will introduce a possibility of a cache with
refcount 0 being temporarily reachable on the slab_list even in case of
no bugs, due to kfree_rcu() in flight.
For these reasons, prevent merging with caches that have zero refcount.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
mm/slab_common.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index 70943a4c1c4b..3ba205bda95d 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -150,9 +150,11 @@ int slab_unmergeable(struct kmem_cache *s)
#endif
/*
- * We may have set a slab to be unmergeable during bootstrap.
+ * We may have set a cache to be unmergeable (-1) during bootstrap.
+ * 0 is for cache being destroyed asynchronously, or cache that failed
+ * to destroy due to outstanding objects.
*/
- if (s->refcount < 0)
+ if (s->refcount <= 0)
return 1;
return 0;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-15 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-15 20:29 [PATCH RFC 0/6] mm, slub: handle pending kfree_rcu() in kmem_cache_destroy() Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2024-07-21 2:36 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] mm, slab: make caches with refcount of 0 unmergeable David Rientjes
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] mm, slab: always maintain per-node slab and object count Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-21 2:37 ` David Rientjes
2024-07-22 14:16 ` Xiongwei Song
2024-07-26 10:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] mm, slab: unlink sysfs and debugfs immediately Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] mm, slab: simplify kmem_cache_release() Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] mm, slab: asynchronously destroy caches with outstanding objects Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] kunit, slub: add test_kfree_rcu() Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-21 2:39 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] mm, slub: handle pending kfree_rcu() in kmem_cache_destroy() David Rientjes
2024-07-22 6:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240715-b4-slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v1-1-46b2984c2205@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox