From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963ACC3DA45 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 20:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C7F976B0088; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 16:56:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C2F456B0089; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 16:56:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B1D4F6B008A; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 16:56:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993446B0088 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 16:56:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06561C1937 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 20:56:33 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82332309066.16.DE629F4 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1C3100003 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 20:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=IJtK9LYW; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 145.40.73.55 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1720817764; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=97/k8W97VFXseeyXUb7dFdkjvKl2R3JBWSCRoDDZVIE=; b=LrnS1gULLiaD7fbkpd7+C2OYDz4YIiMLJpZjy2Bdog5H3nvPPGPF3Cg7vmA5tUu9j6xkvs KowZWYkt9ewayCll5aeL38w7yo3oPHx8hok0ja7VOHlEp0Spnre0c0RlEsfsXZLGbQVn3u mEnmpXsRLATvLiGJnsG6tGfb8H8GUu0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=IJtK9LYW; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 145.40.73.55 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1720817764; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=o9hduufaPxsKknXZD0rbFMzJrzXuX8zz6yypPv7O1V0mQjA4OD10VeUVlPwFtdGIrlKJgM wTLgclm9BQVpjKRDDWHJWvVf50/VdhPXhxUJZnt1pqwXshcpXsXWI5eg10FbSApH/WrLxd 1+JHCe5npHRiSl9bSSWDtHk5yb/+1cI= Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF87ECE1B63; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 20:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF990C32782; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 20:56:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1720817787; bh=97/k8W97VFXseeyXUb7dFdkjvKl2R3JBWSCRoDDZVIE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IJtK9LYWV/hyZrVDz/8pb3w3m17cvPtiEdfn3KXR9Uk8G7fgjyulCNuToK+/Drq8y sLLs/BeNerK8D2suE8g+S/gUXtr5QAerqDxx9OvmBmn5ZRyFShRkOtolhTLTUw1Q3b 0mwcpuyTRAmenQSnxWYgEtI8e5i4KhfwnFiIGujU= Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 13:56:26 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Hugh Dickins Cc: yangge , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 21cnbao@gmail.com, david@redhat.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, liuzixing@hygon.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mm/gup: Clear the LRU flag of a page before adding to LRU batch Message-Id: <20240712135626.3a7cc4b9e959a1124614aa37@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <503f0df7-91e8-07c1-c4a6-124cad9e65e7@google.com> References: <1720075944-27201-1-git-send-email-yangge1116@126.com> <503f0df7-91e8-07c1-c4a6-124cad9e65e7@google.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: ewrfxzfohmsbhdedfwpah9u18th9kzhi X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DE1C3100003 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-HE-Tag: 1720817790-304770 X-HE-Meta: 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 L+TBO1UX ZFJ9epabqzORdF/SWh/6DiqrLNmMyknxB3NDJPFDvLYEFpI2jkl9fljCyw1qoc2z6RoqTW2PdkzuFa3Dya77e8w9HQSj0UyycrfLr4EAEoJuC7pqepq3m4uLR7SxXcP/ZR81JeCk+MCSLFfPv4FMzaPTLZrtB2tpnKK33fX4YdFQAj4utICstf773cp3o8Tnze6HuY53eE48BwSxgThhQ323k2Jr6i+CllXjZLKXHO/GHjOB+JwgHTFzyHY3DA1i/2rT+h+xZuRuzlGcV9SotCy4yHQ== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 01:56:04 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins wrote: > I have no objection to it going forward to 6.11-rc, but I do object to > the Cc stable, and its current placing in mm-hotfixes-unstable (if that > means it's to be rushed into 6.10 final). No probs, I moved it to mm-unstable and removed cc:stable. The issue sounds significant so someone might request a -stable backport in the future, but the workflow doesn't have a way of expressing that.