linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH mm-unstable v1 3/5] mm/swap: fold lru_rotate into cpu_fbatches
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 20:13:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711021317.596178-4-yuzhao@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711021317.596178-1-yuzhao@google.com>

Fold lru_rotate into cpu_fbatches, and rename the folio_batch and the
lock protecting it to lru_move_tail and lock_irq respectively so that
all the boilerplate can be removed at the end of this series.

Also remove data_race() around folio_batch_count(), which is out of
place: all folio_batch_count() calls on remote cpu_fbatches are
subject to data_race(), and therefore data_race() should be inside
folio_batch_count().

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
---
 mm/swap.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index e4745b88a964..774ae9eab1e6 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -47,20 +47,11 @@
 int page_cluster;
 const int page_cluster_max = 31;
 
-/* Protecting only lru_rotate.fbatch which requires disabling interrupts */
-struct lru_rotate {
-	local_lock_t lock;
-	struct folio_batch fbatch;
-};
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct lru_rotate, lru_rotate) = {
-	.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
-};
-
-/*
- * The following folio batches are grouped together because they are protected
- * by disabling preemption (and interrupts remain enabled).
- */
 struct cpu_fbatches {
+	/*
+	 * The following folio batches are grouped together because they are protected
+	 * by disabling preemption (and interrupts remain enabled).
+	 */
 	local_lock_t lock;
 	struct folio_batch lru_add;
 	struct folio_batch lru_deactivate_file;
@@ -69,9 +60,14 @@ struct cpu_fbatches {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	struct folio_batch lru_activate;
 #endif
+	/* Protecting the following batches which require disabling interrupts */
+	local_lock_t lock_irq;
+	struct folio_batch lru_move_tail;
 };
+
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_fbatches, cpu_fbatches) = {
 	.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
+	.lock_irq = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock_irq),
 };
 
 static void __page_cache_release(struct folio *folio, struct lruvec **lruvecp,
@@ -267,10 +263,10 @@ void folio_rotate_reclaimable(struct folio *folio)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	local_lock_irqsave(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
-	fbatch = this_cpu_ptr(&lru_rotate.fbatch);
+	local_lock_irqsave(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
+	fbatch = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_fbatches.lru_move_tail);
 	folio_batch_add_and_move(fbatch, folio, lru_move_tail_fn);
-	local_unlock_irqrestore(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
+	local_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
 }
 
 void lru_note_cost(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file,
@@ -668,15 +664,15 @@ void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu)
 	if (folio_batch_count(fbatch))
 		folio_batch_move_lru(fbatch, lru_add_fn);
 
-	fbatch = &per_cpu(lru_rotate.fbatch, cpu);
+	fbatch = &fbatches->lru_move_tail;
 	/* Disabling interrupts below acts as a compiler barrier. */
 	if (data_race(folio_batch_count(fbatch))) {
 		unsigned long flags;
 
 		/* No harm done if a racing interrupt already did this */
-		local_lock_irqsave(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
+		local_lock_irqsave(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
 		folio_batch_move_lru(fbatch, lru_move_tail_fn);
-		local_unlock_irqrestore(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
+		local_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
 	}
 
 	fbatch = &fbatches->lru_deactivate_file;
@@ -825,7 +821,7 @@ static bool cpu_needs_drain(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	/* Check these in order of likelihood that they're not zero */
 	return folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_add) ||
-		data_race(folio_batch_count(&per_cpu(lru_rotate.fbatch, cpu))) ||
+		folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_move_tail) ||
 		folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_deactivate_file) ||
 		folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_deactivate) ||
 		folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_lazyfree) ||
-- 
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-11  2:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-11  2:13 [PATCH mm-unstable v1 0/5] mm/swap: remove boilerplate Yu Zhao
2024-07-11  2:13 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 1/5] mm/swap: reduce indentation level Yu Zhao
2024-07-11  2:13 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 2/5] mm/swap: rename cpu_fbatches->activate Yu Zhao
2024-07-11  2:13 ` Yu Zhao [this message]
2024-07-11  2:13 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 4/5] mm/swap: remove remaining _fn suffix Yu Zhao
2024-07-11  2:13 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 5/5] mm/swap: remove boilerplate Yu Zhao
2024-07-26  5:48   ` Barry Song
2024-07-26  5:56     ` Barry Song
2024-07-26  6:50       ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-04  6:55   ` Hugh Dickins
2024-08-04 21:36     ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-05 19:14       ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240711021317.596178-4-yuzhao@google.com \
    --to=yuzhao@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox