From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH mm-unstable v1 3/5] mm/swap: fold lru_rotate into cpu_fbatches
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 20:13:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711021317.596178-4-yuzhao@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711021317.596178-1-yuzhao@google.com>
Fold lru_rotate into cpu_fbatches, and rename the folio_batch and the
lock protecting it to lru_move_tail and lock_irq respectively so that
all the boilerplate can be removed at the end of this series.
Also remove data_race() around folio_batch_count(), which is out of
place: all folio_batch_count() calls on remote cpu_fbatches are
subject to data_race(), and therefore data_race() should be inside
folio_batch_count().
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
---
mm/swap.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index e4745b88a964..774ae9eab1e6 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -47,20 +47,11 @@
int page_cluster;
const int page_cluster_max = 31;
-/* Protecting only lru_rotate.fbatch which requires disabling interrupts */
-struct lru_rotate {
- local_lock_t lock;
- struct folio_batch fbatch;
-};
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct lru_rotate, lru_rotate) = {
- .lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
-};
-
-/*
- * The following folio batches are grouped together because they are protected
- * by disabling preemption (and interrupts remain enabled).
- */
struct cpu_fbatches {
+ /*
+ * The following folio batches are grouped together because they are protected
+ * by disabling preemption (and interrupts remain enabled).
+ */
local_lock_t lock;
struct folio_batch lru_add;
struct folio_batch lru_deactivate_file;
@@ -69,9 +60,14 @@ struct cpu_fbatches {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
struct folio_batch lru_activate;
#endif
+ /* Protecting the following batches which require disabling interrupts */
+ local_lock_t lock_irq;
+ struct folio_batch lru_move_tail;
};
+
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_fbatches, cpu_fbatches) = {
.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
+ .lock_irq = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock_irq),
};
static void __page_cache_release(struct folio *folio, struct lruvec **lruvecp,
@@ -267,10 +263,10 @@ void folio_rotate_reclaimable(struct folio *folio)
return;
}
- local_lock_irqsave(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
- fbatch = this_cpu_ptr(&lru_rotate.fbatch);
+ local_lock_irqsave(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
+ fbatch = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_fbatches.lru_move_tail);
folio_batch_add_and_move(fbatch, folio, lru_move_tail_fn);
- local_unlock_irqrestore(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
+ local_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
}
void lru_note_cost(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file,
@@ -668,15 +664,15 @@ void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu)
if (folio_batch_count(fbatch))
folio_batch_move_lru(fbatch, lru_add_fn);
- fbatch = &per_cpu(lru_rotate.fbatch, cpu);
+ fbatch = &fbatches->lru_move_tail;
/* Disabling interrupts below acts as a compiler barrier. */
if (data_race(folio_batch_count(fbatch))) {
unsigned long flags;
/* No harm done if a racing interrupt already did this */
- local_lock_irqsave(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
+ local_lock_irqsave(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
folio_batch_move_lru(fbatch, lru_move_tail_fn);
- local_unlock_irqrestore(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
+ local_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
}
fbatch = &fbatches->lru_deactivate_file;
@@ -825,7 +821,7 @@ static bool cpu_needs_drain(unsigned int cpu)
/* Check these in order of likelihood that they're not zero */
return folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_add) ||
- data_race(folio_batch_count(&per_cpu(lru_rotate.fbatch, cpu))) ||
+ folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_move_tail) ||
folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_deactivate_file) ||
folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_deactivate) ||
folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_lazyfree) ||
--
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-11 2:13 [PATCH mm-unstable v1 0/5] mm/swap: remove boilerplate Yu Zhao
2024-07-11 2:13 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 1/5] mm/swap: reduce indentation level Yu Zhao
2024-07-11 2:13 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 2/5] mm/swap: rename cpu_fbatches->activate Yu Zhao
2024-07-11 2:13 ` Yu Zhao [this message]
2024-07-11 2:13 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 4/5] mm/swap: remove remaining _fn suffix Yu Zhao
2024-07-11 2:13 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 5/5] mm/swap: remove boilerplate Yu Zhao
2024-07-26 5:48 ` Barry Song
2024-07-26 5:56 ` Barry Song
2024-07-26 6:50 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-04 6:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2024-08-04 21:36 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-05 19:14 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240711021317.596178-4-yuzhao@google.com \
--to=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox