From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: david@fromorbit.com, willy@infradead.org,
chandan.babu@oracle.com, djwong@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
hare@suse.de, p.raghav@samsung.com, mcgrof@kernel.org,
gost.dev@samsung.com, cl@os.amperecomputing.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/10] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 11:04:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240709110423.wdteahoeufrt22jk@quentin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D2K7HHAVJDR9.8PR2HQZ00FXA@nvidia.com>
>
> This should be
>
> if (!folio->mapping) {
> if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> count_vm_event(THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> Otherwise, a non PMD mappable folio with no mapping will fall through
> and cause NULL pointer dereference in mapping_min_folio_order().
Ah, of course. I thought I was being "smart" here to avoid another
nesting. Instead of triple nested ifs, I guess this is better:
int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
{
unsigned int min_order = 0;
if (folio_test_anon(folio))
goto out;
if (!folio->mapping) {
if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
count_vm_event(THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
return -EBUSY;
}
min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);
out:
return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(&folio->page, list,
min_order);
}
Let me know what you think!
>
> > + min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(&folio->page, list, min_order);
> > +}
> > +
> > void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio)
> > {
> > struct deferred_split *ds_queue;
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-09 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-04 11:23 [PATCH v9 00/10] enable bs > ps in XFS Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] filemap: allocate mapping_min_order folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in readahead Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-08 13:53 ` Zi Yan
2024-07-09 11:04 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) [this message]
2024-07-09 12:49 ` Zi Yan
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] filemap: cap PTE range to be created to allowed zero fill in folio_map_range() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 15:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-04 22:13 ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-05 6:14 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-05 14:19 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-08 17:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-08 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] xfs: use kvmalloc for xattr buffers Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] xfs: expose block size in stat Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] xfs: make the calculation generic in xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 10/10] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-08 22:12 ` [PATCH v9 00/10] enable bs > ps in XFS Luis Chamberlain
2024-07-08 22:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-08 22:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240709110423.wdteahoeufrt22jk@quentin \
--to=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=cl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox