From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, nathan@kernel.org, nicolas@fjasle.eu,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] modpost: .meminit.* is not in init section when CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG set
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 06:12:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240706061236.snp4r2tixx3h7hfe@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240705065456.dogycpd37jun44p5@master>
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 06:54:56AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:44:38PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:40 AM Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> .meminit.* is not put into init section when CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG is
>>> set, since we define MEM_KEEP()/MEM_DISCARD() according to
>>> CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>>> CC: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> scripts/mod/modpost.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>>
>>
>>NACK.
>>
>>
>>The section mismatch is performed _unconditionally_.
>>
>>
>>
>>In the old days, we did this depending on relevant CONFIG options.
>>It was more than 15 years ago that we stopped doing that.
>>
>>
>>See this:
>>
>>
>>commit eb8f689046b857874e964463619f09df06d59fad
>>Author: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
>>Date: Sun Jan 20 20:07:28 2008 +0100
>>
>> Use separate sections for __dev/__cpu/__mem code/data
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>So, if you wanted to check this only when CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n,
>>you would need to add #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG to include/linux/init.h
>>
>>That is what we did in the Linux 2.6.* era, which had much worse
>>section mismatch coverage.
>>
>
>Masahiro
>
>If you would give me some suggestions, I'd appreciate it a lot.
>
>The original thing I want to do is to put function __free_pages_core() in
>__meminit section, since this function is only used by __init functions and
>in memory_hotplug.c. This means it is save to release it if
>CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG is set.
>
>Then I add __meminit to function __free_pages_core() and face the warning from
>modpost.
>
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: generic_online_page+0xa (section: .text) -> __free_pages_core (section: .meminit.text)
>
>A .text function calls init code is not proper. Then I add __meminit to
>generic_online_page too. Then I face this warning from modpost.
>
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: generic_online_page: EXPORT_SYMBOL used for init symbol. Remove __init or EXPORT_SYMBOL.
>
I guess I found the correct way.
Add __ref to generic_online_page to not issue a warning.
>Function generic_online_page() is exported and be used in some modules. And is
>not allowed to use init tag.
>
>When looking into the code, this warning is printed by this code:
>
> #define ALL_INIT_SECTIONS INIT_SECTIONS, ALL_XXXINIT_SECTIONS
>
> if (match(secname, PATTERNS(ALL_INIT_SECTIONS)))
> warn("%s: %s: EXPORT_SYMBOL used for init symbol. Remove __init or EXPORT_SYMBOL.\n",
> mod->name, name);
>
>If my understanding is correct, the code means we can't use a function in init
>section, since the code will be released after bootup.
>
>But for this case, when CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG is set, the section .meminit.*
>is not put into the real init sections. So the functions are not released and
>could be used by modules. This behavior is introduced in commit
>eb8f689046b8(the one you mentioned above).
>
>So the check here is not proper to me. We should exclude .meminit.* from
>ALL_INIT_SECTIONS.
>
>Looking forward your suggestion and a proper way to handle this.
>
>--
>Wei Yang
>Help you, Help me
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-06 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-02 23:40 [PATCH 1/3] mm: use zonelist_zone() to get zone Wei Yang
2024-07-02 23:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] modpost: .meminit.* is not in init section when CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG set Wei Yang
2024-07-03 1:52 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-03 14:49 ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-07-03 14:44 ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-07-04 2:27 ` Wei Yang
2024-07-05 6:54 ` Wei Yang
2024-07-06 6:12 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2024-07-06 13:50 ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-07-07 0:04 ` Wei Yang
2024-07-02 23:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/page_alloc: put __free_pages_core() in __meminit section Wei Yang
2024-07-05 9:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: use zonelist_zone() to get zone David Hildenbrand
2024-07-06 0:51 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240706061236.snp4r2tixx3h7hfe@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox