linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/9] mm: memcg: put memcg1-specific struct mem_cgroup's members under CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:35:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240704163534.e82b0d4108ab70319781d6a9@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ug2qpeiq6jrtr4qtnblquiod7rgqdqsy6nfu5idnpxqwrzdq6o@mmbsul2g6t52>

On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:48:54 -0700 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote:

> > -	/* For oom notifier event fd */
> > -	struct list_head oom_notify;
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Should we move charges of a task when a task is moved into this
> > -	 * mem_cgroup ? And what type of charges should we move ?
> > -	 */
> > -	unsigned long move_charge_at_immigrate;
> > -	/* taken only while moving_account > 0 */
> > -	spinlock_t		move_lock;
> > -	unsigned long		move_lock_flags;
> > -
> >  	CACHELINE_PADDING(_pad1_);
> 
> Let's also remove these _pad1_ and also _pad2_ as well as this
> rearrangement nullifies the reasons behind these paddings. We need to
> run some perf benchmarks to identify the newer false cache sharing
> ields.

I guess this is going to be a followup patch (please).


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-04 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-28 21:03 [PATCH v1 0/9] mm: memcg: put cgroup v1-specific memcg data " Roman Gushchin
2024-06-28 21:03 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] mm: memcg: move memcg_account_kmem() to memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-29  0:30   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-28 21:03 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] mm: memcg: factor out legacy socket memory accounting code Roman Gushchin
2024-06-29  0:39   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-28 21:03 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] mm: memcg: guard cgroup v1-specific code in mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo() Roman Gushchin
2024-06-29  0:40   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-28 21:03 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] mm: memcg: gather memcg1-specific fields initialization in memcg1_memcg_init() Roman Gushchin
2024-06-29  0:43   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-28 21:03 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] mm: memcg: guard memcg1-specific fields accesses in mm/memcontrol.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-29  0:49   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-28 21:03 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] mm: memcg: put memcg1-specific struct mem_cgroup's members under CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 Roman Gushchin
2024-06-29  0:48   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-07-04 23:35     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-07-05  3:43       ` Shakeel Butt
2024-07-03 15:12   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-28 21:03 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] mm: memcg: guard memcg1-specific members of struct mem_cgroup_per_node Roman Gushchin
2024-06-29  0:52   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-07-03 15:13   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-28 21:03 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] mm: memcg: put struct task_struct::memcg_in_oom under CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 Roman Gushchin
2024-06-29  0:53   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-28 21:03 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] mm: memcg: put struct task_struct::in_user_fault " Roman Gushchin
2024-06-29  0:55   ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240704163534.e82b0d4108ab70319781d6a9@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox