linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Rui Qi <qirui.001@bytedance.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure: allow memory allocation from emergency reserves
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:26:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240704162629.cf750dd1ee58c70d358466f3@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <070697f1-83f5-ff8e-dfc0-2f99c98c448c@huawei.com>

On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 16:04:02 +0800 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote:

> >> Tasks might not be killed even to_kill struct is allocated.
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> -	raw_hwp = kmalloc(sizeof(struct raw_hwp_page), GFP_ATOMIC);
> >>> +	raw_hwp = kmalloc(sizeof(struct raw_hwp_page), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_MEMALLOC);
> >>
> >> In already hardware poisoned code path, raw_hwp can be allocated to store raw page info
> >> without killing anything. So __GFP_MEMALLOC might not be suitable to use.
> >> Or am I miss something?
> > 
> > Yes, I'm doubtful about this patch.  I think that rather than poking at a
> > particular implementation, it would be helpful for us to see a complete
> > description of the issues which were observed, please.  Let's see the
> > bug report and we can discuss fixes later.
> 
> I agree with you, Andrew. Thanks. :)

I dropped the patch.  Please let's proceed as discussed above.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-04 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-25  2:23 Rui Qi
2024-06-25 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2024-06-29  2:09 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-07-02  7:19   ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-02  8:04     ` Miaohe Lin
2024-07-04 23:26       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-07-05  1:04         ` Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240704162629.cf750dd1ee58c70d358466f3@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=qirui.001@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox