linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Cc: minchan@kernel.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/zsmalloc: move record_obj() into obj_malloc()
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:25:00 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240628022500.GF15925@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240627075959.611783-2-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>

On (24/06/27 15:59), Chengming Zhou wrote:
> We always record_obj() to make handle points to object after obj_malloc(),
> so simplify the code by moving record_obj() into obj_malloc(). There
> should be no functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>

I guess I don't have a strong opinion on that.

FWIW
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>

[..]
> @@ -1591,7 +1589,6 @@ static void migrate_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool, struct zspage *src_zspage,
>  		free_obj = obj_malloc(pool, dst_zspage, handle);
>  		zs_object_copy(class, free_obj, used_obj);
>  		obj_idx++;
> -		record_obj(handle, free_obj);
>  		obj_free(class->size, used_obj);

I sort of like how here we would copy the object first and then record it,
some sort of "commit" stage.  But I don't see any issues with the new code.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-28  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-27  7:59 [PATCH 1/2] mm/zsmalloc: fix class per-fullness zspage counts Chengming Zhou
2024-06-27  7:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/zsmalloc: move record_obj() into obj_malloc() Chengming Zhou
2024-06-28  2:25   ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2024-06-27 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/zsmalloc: fix class per-fullness zspage counts Andrew Morton
2024-06-28  0:51   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-06-28  0:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-06-28  1:08   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-06-28  3:19     ` Chengming Zhou
2024-07-01  1:37       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-07-01  2:20         ` Chengming Zhou
2024-07-01  2:49           ` Chengming Zhou
2024-07-01  3:13             ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240628022500.GF15925@google.com \
    --to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox