linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  autofs@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	 linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,  Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev,
	 linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Hans Caniullan <hcaniull@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] fs_parse: add uid & gid option option parsing helpers
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:23:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240628-fernfahrt-missverstanden-01543e7492b4@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240628094517.ifs4bp73nlggsnxz@quack3>

On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:45:17AM GMT, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 27-06-24 19:26:24, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Multiple filesystems take uid and gid as options, and the code to
> > create the ID from an integer and validate it is standard boilerplate
> > that can be moved into common helper functions, so do that for
> > consistency and less cut&paste.
> > 
> > This also helps avoid the buggy pattern noted by Seth Jenkins at
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALxfFW4BXhEwxR0Q5LSkg-8Vb4r2MONKCcUCVioehXQKr35eHg@mail.gmail.com/
> > because uid/gid parsing will fail before any assignment in most
> > filesystems.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
> 
> I like the idea since this seems like a nobrainer but is actually
> surprisingly subtle...
> 
> > diff --git a/fs/fs_parser.c b/fs/fs_parser.c
> > index a4d6ca0b8971..24727ec34e5a 100644
> > --- a/fs/fs_parser.c
> > +++ b/fs/fs_parser.c
> > @@ -308,6 +308,40 @@ int fs_param_is_fd(struct p_log *log, const struct fs_parameter_spec *p,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(fs_param_is_fd);
> >  
> > +int fs_param_is_uid(struct p_log *log, const struct fs_parameter_spec *p,
> > +		    struct fs_parameter *param, struct fs_parse_result *result)
> > +{
> > +	kuid_t uid;
> > +
> > +	if (fs_param_is_u32(log, p, param, result) != 0)
> > +		return fs_param_bad_value(log, param);
> > +
> > +	uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(), result->uint_32);
> 
> But here is the problem: Filesystems mountable in user namespaces need to use
> fc->user_ns for resolving uids / gids (e.g. like fuse_parse_param()).
> Having helpers that work for some filesystems and are subtly broken for
> others is worse than no helpers... Or am I missing something?
> 
> And the problem with fc->user_ns is that currently __fs_parse() does not
> get fs_context as an argument... So that will need some larger work.

Not really. If someone does an fsopen() in a namespace but the process
that actually sets mount options is in another namespace then it's
completely intransparent what uid/gid this will resolve to if it's
resovled according to fsopen().

It's also a bit strange if someone ends up handing off a tmpfs fscontext
that was created in the initial namespace to some random namespace and
they now can set uid/gid options that aren't mapped according to their
namespace but instead are 1:1 resolved according to the intial
namespace. So this would hinder delegation.

The expectation is that uid/gid options are resolved in the caller's
namespace and that shouldn't be any different for fscontexts for
namespace mountable filesystems. The crucial point is to ensure that the
resulting kuid/kgid can be resolved in the namespace the filesystem is
mounted in at the end. That's what was lacking in e.g., tmpfs in commit
0200679fc795 ("tmpfs: verify {g,u}id mount options correctly")

The fuse conversion is the only inconsistency in that regard.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-28 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-28  0:24 [PATCH 0/14] New uid & gid mount " Eric Sandeen
2024-06-28  0:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] fs_parse: add uid & gid option " Eric Sandeen
2024-06-28  9:45   ` Jan Kara
2024-06-28 12:23     ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2024-07-01  9:34       ` Jan Kara
2024-06-28 13:44     ` Eric Sandeen
2024-06-28  0:35 ` [PATCH 08/14] hugetlbfs: Convert to new uid/gid " Eric Sandeen
2024-06-28  0:38 ` [PATCH 11/14] tmpfs: " Eric Sandeen
2024-06-28 11:51 ` [PATCH 0/14] New uid & gid mount " Christian Brauner
2024-07-02  4:25 ` (subset) " Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240628-fernfahrt-missverstanden-01543e7492b4@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=autofs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hcaniull@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=ntfs3@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox