From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: david@fromorbit.com, willy@infradead.org,
chandan.babu@oracle.com, djwong@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
hare@suse.de, p.raghav@samsung.com, mcgrof@kernel.org,
gost.dev@samsung.com, cl@os.amperecomputing.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, Zi Yan <zi.yan@sent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/10] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:20:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240625172031.y5yyukeudinescxk@quentin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D296GAEAQVJB.3FXBQ0WEUJ384@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:45:09AM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> On Tue Jun 25, 2024 at 7:44 AM EDT, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> > From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> >
> > split_folio() and split_folio_to_list() assume order 0, to support
> > minorder for non-anonymous folios, we must expand these to check the
> > folio mapping order and use that.
> >
> > Set new_order to be at least minimum folio order if it is set in
> > split_huge_page_to_list() so that we can maintain minimum folio order
> > requirement in the page cache.
> >
> > Update the debugfs write files used for testing to ensure the order
> > is respected as well. We simply enforce the min order when a file
> > mapping is used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> > ---
> > There was a discussion about whether we need to consider truncation of
> > folio to be considered a split failure or not [1]. The new code has
> > retained the existing behaviour of returning a failure if the folio was
> > truncated. I think we need to have a separate discussion whethere or not
> > to consider it as a failure.
>
> <snip>
>
> >
> > +int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int min_order = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!folio_test_anon(folio)) {
> > + if (!folio->mapping) {
> > + count_vm_event(THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
>
> Regardless this folio split is from a truncation or not, you should not
> count every folio split as a THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED. Since not every
> folio is a THP. You need to do:
>
> if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> count_vm_event(THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
>
> See commit 835c3a25aa37 ("mm: huge_memory: add the missing
> folio_test_pmd_mappable() for THP split statistics")
You are right, I will change that. I didn't notice this commit.
>
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > + }
> > + min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(&folio->page, list, min_order);
> > +}
> > +
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-25 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-25 11:44 [PATCH v8 00/10] enable bs > ps in XFS Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 12:23 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-04 15:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-04 15:52 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-04 21:28 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 22:06 ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-04 23:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-05 4:32 ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-05 9:03 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-05 12:45 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-05 13:24 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-05 13:31 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-05 14:14 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-08 23:01 ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-09 8:11 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-09 13:08 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-05 15:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-04 21:34 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-09 16:29 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-09 16:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-09 17:33 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-09 16:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-09 21:08 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-09 21:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] filemap: allocate mapping_min_order folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 15:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-06-25 18:06 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in readahead Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-02 19:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-03 14:10 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 14:24 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-04 14:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 14:45 ` Zi Yan
2024-06-25 17:20 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) [this message]
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] filemap: cap PTE range to be created to allowed zero fill in folio_map_range() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-01 23:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-01 2:37 ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-01 11:22 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-01 23:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-02 7:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 10:15 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-02 12:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 14:01 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-02 15:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 16:13 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-02 16:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-02 17:10 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-03 5:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 16:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-02 13:49 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] xfs: use kvmalloc for xattr buffers Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 18:07 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] xfs: expose block size in stat Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-01 2:33 ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] xfs: make the calculation generic in xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-01 2:34 ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-01 2:34 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240625172031.y5yyukeudinescxk@quentin \
--to=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=cl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=zi.yan@sent.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox