From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, audit@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] tracing: Replace memcpy() with __get_task_comm()
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:40:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240603184016.3374559f@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240603183742.17b34bc3@gandalf.local.home>
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:37:42 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> Note, I've been wanting to get rid of the hard coded TASK_COMM_LEN from the
> events for a while. As I mentioned before, the only reason the memcpy exists
> is because it was added before the __string() logic was. Then it became
> somewhat of a habit to do that for everything that referenced task->comm. :-/
My point is that if we are going to be changing the way we record
task->comm in the events, might as well do the change I've been wanting to
do for years. I'd hold off on the sched_switch event, as that's the one
event (and perhaps sched_waking events) that user space may be have
hardcoded how to read it.
I would be interested in changing it, just to see what breaks, so I would
know where to go fix things. But keep it a separate patch so that it could
be easily reverted.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-03 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-02 2:37 [PATCH 0/6] kernel: Avoid memcpy of task comm Yafang Shao
2024-06-02 2:37 ` [PATCH 1/6] fs/exec: Drop task_lock() inside __get_task_comm() Yafang Shao
2024-06-02 3:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-02 6:56 ` Yafang Shao
2024-06-02 16:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-06-02 17:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-02 18:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-06-03 11:35 ` Yafang Shao
2024-06-10 12:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-10 23:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-06-02 17:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-04 13:02 ` Matus Jokay
2024-06-04 20:01 ` Matus Jokay
2024-06-05 2:48 ` Yafang Shao
2024-06-02 2:37 ` [PATCH 2/6] tracing: Replace memcpy() with __get_task_comm() Yafang Shao
2024-06-03 21:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-03 21:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-03 22:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-03 22:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-03 22:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-03 22:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-03 22:40 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2024-06-04 2:35 ` Yafang Shao
2024-06-02 2:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] auditsc: " Yafang Shao
2024-06-03 21:03 ` Paul Moore
2024-06-02 2:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] security: " Yafang Shao
2024-06-03 22:06 ` Paul Moore
2024-06-02 2:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] bpftool: Make task comm always be NUL-terminated Yafang Shao
2024-06-02 21:01 ` Quentin Monnet
2024-06-02 2:46 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests/bpf: Replace memcpy() with __get_task_comm() Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240603184016.3374559f@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox