From: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
To: "richard.weiyang@gmail.com" <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@gmail.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"tkjos@google.com" <tkjos@google.com>,
Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: (2) (2) [RESEND PATCH 00/10] memblock: introduce memsize showing reserved memory
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 18:33:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240603093310epcms1p893f1ed36c0531917b69eb77e3ddfd794@epcms1p8> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240601014045.jkk3ydsu4zns2bfc@master>
>On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:21:41PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>>>On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 07:49:28PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>>>>>On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:10:29PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>>>>>>(Sorry I might forget to change to be plain text)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh good thing, I did not know this patch. Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>By the way, I've tried to get memblock/memory and kernel log from a
>>>>>>device based on
>>>>>>v6.6.17 kernel device, to see upstream patches above.
>>>>>>memblok/memory does not show region for
>>>>>
>>>>>memblock/memory only shows ranges put in "memory".
>>>>>memblock/reserved shows ranges put in "reserved".
>>>>>
>>>>>If we just put them in "reserved", it will not displayed in "memory".
>>>>
>>>>Hi
>>>>Let me explain more.
>>>>
>>>>In this case, the intially passed memory starts from 0000000081960000 so memblock/memory shows as it is.
>>>>
>>>># xxd -g 8 /proc/device-tree/memory/reg
>>>>00000000: 0000000081960000 00000000000a0000 ................
>>>>00000010: 0000000081a40000 00000000001c0000 ................
>>>>
>>>># cat sys/kernel/debug/memblock/memory
>>>> 0: 0x0000000081960000..0x00000000819fffff 0 NONE
>>>> 1: 0x0000000081a40000..0x0000000081bfffff 0 NONE
>>>>
>>>># cat sys/kernel/debug/memblock/reserved
>>>> 0: 0x0000000082800000..0x00000000847fffff 0 NONE
>>>>
>>>>The memblock information in the kernel log may report like it allocated those memblock regions, as there was not overlapped even though it is already no-map.
>>>>
>>>>(I removed the name.)
>>>><6>[ 0.000000][ T0] OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000080000000..0x0000000080dfffff (14336 KiB) nomap non-reusable AAA
>>>><6>[ 0.000000][ T0] OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000080e00000..0x00000000811fffff (4096 KiB) nomap non-reusable BBB
>>>><6>[ 0.000000][ T0] OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000081200000..0x00000000813fffff (2048 KiB) nomap non-reusable CCC
>>>><6>[ 0.000000][ T0] OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000081a00000..0x0000000081a3ffff (256 KiB) nomap non-reusable DDD
>>>>
>>>
>>>This looks not printed by memblock_reserve(), right? It is printed by your own
>>>driver?
>>
>>AFAIK these log came from the commit below.
>>aeb9267eb6b1 of: reserved-mem: print out reserved-mem details during boot
>>
>>>
>>>>So a smart parser should combine the krenel log and the memblock/memory log.
>>>>
>>>>In my memsize feature shows it like this though.
>>>>
>>>>0x0000000081400000-0x0000000081960000 0x00560000 ( 5504 KB ) nomap unusable unknown
>>>>
>>>>BR
>>>>
>>>
>>>I am sorry, I still not catch your point. Let me try to understand your message.
>>>
>>>You mentioned several regions, let me put them in order.
>>>
>>>(1) 0x0000000080000000..0x0000000080dfffff printed by driver
>>>(2) 0x0000000080e00000..0x00000000811fffff printed by driver
>>>(3) 0x0000000081200000..0x00000000813fffff printed by driver
>>>(4) 0x0000000081400000..0x0000000081960000 expected to print in new debugfs
>>>(5) 0x0000000081960000..0x00000000819fffff listed in reg/memory
>>>(6) 0x0000000081a00000..0x0000000081a3ffff printed by driver
>>>(7) 0x0000000081a40000..0x0000000081bfffff listed in reg/memory
>>>(8) 0x0000000082800000..0x00000000847fffff listed in reserved
>>>
>>>If you just want information for region (4), sound we can do it in user-space?
>>>
>>>BTW, are region 1, 2, 3, 6, reserved in membock?
>>
>>Yes correct, I though (4) case could be shown to easily catch these hidden regions.
>>As I said, I think 1, 2, 3, 6 seem to be not passed to kernel, it was just tried as
>>they are defined in kernel device tree.
>>
>
>As you mentioned above, 1, 2, 3, 6, is printed by "of" driver. And those
>information is not shown in memblock/reserve.
>
>I am afraid the proper way is to let memblock know those ranges. Sounds "of"
>driver doesn't tell memblock about these.
>
Yes that is the reason why I added some code to 'of' driver, too. As I said,
if we don't change 'of' driver and memblck, we need a smart parser looking into
kernel log and memblock info, and understand these special cases.
BR
>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Wei Yang
>>>Help you, Help me
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-03 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
2024-05-21 2:39 ` Jaewon Kim
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p4451928c8f5b32bf84082a24c59ca7dd0@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2024-05-21 2:39 ` [RESEND PATCH 01/10] " Jaewon Kim
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p3e80e90863a453053d5aac901ef644070@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2024-05-21 2:39 ` [RESEND PATCH 02/10] memblock: detect hidden memory hole size Jaewon Kim
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p152671a613e86fa83d840962ee3db50fb@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
2024-05-21 2:39 ` [RESEND PATCH 03/10] memblock: handle overlapped reserved memory region Jaewon Kim
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p3440f857e3b31b319c270e2d658379383@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2024-05-21 2:39 ` [RESEND PATCH 04/10] memblock: take a region intersecting an unknown region Jaewon Kim
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p20ddcabed3d037904a9c651d27f82c077@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2024-05-21 2:39 ` [RESEND PATCH 05/10] memblock: track memblock changed at early param Jaewon Kim
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p40d0ea59e8ae93f6cc89846626fea4207@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2024-05-21 2:39 ` [RESEND PATCH 06/10] memblock: recognize late freed size by checking PageReserved Jaewon Kim
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p3ccda7b2d9e6518b4575427c957e19377@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2024-05-21 2:39 ` [RESEND PATCH 07/10] memblock: track kernel size on memsize Jaewon Kim
2024-05-22 19:03 ` kernel test robot
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p291bbc11c4e5cdaa922ca302d95330e6b@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2024-05-21 2:39 ` [RESEND PATCH 08/10] memblock: print memsize summary information Jaewon Kim
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p441a4c458d251eec7bb6e63e671c25b4e@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2024-05-21 2:39 ` [RESEND PATCH 09/10] memblock: print kernel internal size Jaewon Kim
2024-05-22 18:52 ` kernel test robot
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p15a3290b675ee66339033c185a5a8c00b@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
2024-05-21 2:39 ` [RESEND PATCH 10/10] memblock: support memsize reusable to consider as reusable Jaewon Kim
2024-05-22 22:40 ` kernel test robot
[not found] ` <CGME20240522224129epcas1p10433785cc14bef5de93e9f26aa599ff0@epcms1p8>
2024-05-23 10:55 ` Jaewon Kim
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcms1p6>
2024-05-21 2:53 ` [RESEND PATCH 00/10] memblock: introduce memsize showing reserved memory Jaewon Kim
2024-05-21 7:31 ` Mike Rapoport
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcms1p5>
2024-05-21 10:17 ` Jaewon Kim
2024-05-22 8:16 ` (2) " Wei Yang
2024-05-23 14:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-05-24 17:33 ` Pintu Agarwal
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcms1p8>
2024-05-22 8:47 ` Jaewon Kim
2024-05-23 8:55 ` Wei Yang
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcms1p2>
2024-05-23 9:23 ` 김재원
2024-05-24 9:07 ` (2) " Jaewon Kim
2024-05-26 13:55 ` Mike Rapoport
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcms1p7>
2024-05-27 1:30 ` Jaewon Kim
[not found] ` <20240529095119epcms1p73f0e9ff756bcb2ee6a14db459128a644@epcms1p7>
2024-05-29 11:35 ` Wei Yang
2024-05-29 13:10 ` Jaewon Kim
2024-05-30 0:03 ` Wei Yang
2024-05-27 1:35 ` Jaewon Kim
2024-05-27 16:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-05-30 10:49 ` Jaewon Kim
2024-05-31 1:05 ` (2) " Wei Yang
[not found] ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcms1p4>
2024-05-31 8:21 ` Jaewon Kim
2024-06-01 1:40 ` Wei Yang
2024-06-03 9:33 ` Jaewon Kim [this message]
2024-05-22 8:20 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240603093310epcms1p893f1ed36c0531917b69eb77e3ddfd794@epcms1p8 \
--to=jaewon31.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jaewon31.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pintu.ping@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox