linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: "richard.weiyang@gmail.com" <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@gmail.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tkjos@google.com" <tkjos@google.com>,
	Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (2) (2) [RESEND PATCH 00/10] memblock: introduce memsize showing reserved memory
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 01:05:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240531010551.hs67amz34mljyifw@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240530104928epcms1p8108ece61c39c6e3d0361d445c15352d1@epcms1p8>

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 07:49:28PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>>On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:10:29PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>>>(Sorry I might forget to change to be plain text)
>>>
>>>Oh good thing, I did not know this patch. Thanks.
>>>
>>>By the way, I've tried to get memblock/memory and kernel log from a
>>>device based on
>>>v6.6.17 kernel device, to see upstream patches above.
>>>memblok/memory does not show region for
>>
>>memblock/memory only shows ranges put in "memory".
>>memblock/reserved shows ranges put in "reserved".
>>
>>If we just put them in "reserved", it will not displayed in "memory".
>
>Hi
>Let me explain more.
>
>In this case, the intially passed memory starts from 0000000081960000 so memblock/memory shows as it is.
>
># xxd -g 8 /proc/device-tree/memory/reg
>00000000: 0000000081960000 00000000000a0000  ................
>00000010: 0000000081a40000 00000000001c0000  ................
>
># cat sys/kernel/debug/memblock/memory
>   0: 0x0000000081960000..0x00000000819fffff    0 NONE
>   1: 0x0000000081a40000..0x0000000081bfffff    0 NONE
>
># cat sys/kernel/debug/memblock/reserved
>   0: 0x0000000082800000..0x00000000847fffff    0 NONE
>
>The memblock information in the kernel log may report like it allocated those memblock regions, as there was not overlapped even though it is already no-map.
>
>(I removed the name.)
><6>[    0.000000][    T0] OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000080000000..0x0000000080dfffff (14336 KiB) nomap non-reusable AAA
><6>[    0.000000][    T0] OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000080e00000..0x00000000811fffff (4096 KiB) nomap non-reusable BBB
><6>[    0.000000][    T0] OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000081200000..0x00000000813fffff (2048 KiB) nomap non-reusable CCC
><6>[    0.000000][    T0] OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000081a00000..0x0000000081a3ffff (256 KiB) nomap non-reusable DDD
>

This looks not printed by memblock_reserve(), right? It is printed by your own
driver?

>So a smart parser should combine the krenel log and the memblock/memory log.
>
>In my memsize feature shows it like this though.
>
>0x0000000081400000-0x0000000081960000 0x00560000 (    5504 KB ) nomap unusable unknown
>
>BR
>

I am sorry, I still not catch your point. Let me try to understand your message.

You mentioned several regions, let me put them in order.

(1)   0x0000000080000000..0x0000000080dfffff    printed by driver
(2)   0x0000000080e00000..0x00000000811fffff    printed by driver
(3)   0x0000000081200000..0x00000000813fffff    printed by driver
(4)   0x0000000081400000..0x0000000081960000    expected to print in new debugfs
(5)   0x0000000081960000..0x00000000819fffff    listed in reg/memory
(6)   0x0000000081a00000..0x0000000081a3ffff    printed by driver
(7)   0x0000000081a40000..0x0000000081bfffff    listed in reg/memory
(8)   0x0000000082800000..0x00000000847fffff    listed in reserved

If you just want information for region (4), sound we can do it in user-space?

BTW, are region 1, 2, 3, 6, reserved in membock?

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-31  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
2024-05-21  2:39 ` Jaewon Kim
     [not found]   ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p4451928c8f5b32bf84082a24c59ca7dd0@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2024-05-21  2:39     ` [RESEND PATCH 01/10] " Jaewon Kim
     [not found]   ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p3e80e90863a453053d5aac901ef644070@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2024-05-21  2:39     ` [RESEND PATCH 02/10] memblock: detect hidden memory hole size Jaewon Kim
     [not found]   ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p152671a613e86fa83d840962ee3db50fb@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
2024-05-21  2:39     ` [RESEND PATCH 03/10] memblock: handle overlapped reserved memory region Jaewon Kim
     [not found]   ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p3440f857e3b31b319c270e2d658379383@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2024-05-21  2:39     ` [RESEND PATCH 04/10] memblock: take a region intersecting an unknown region Jaewon Kim
     [not found]   ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p20ddcabed3d037904a9c651d27f82c077@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2024-05-21  2:39     ` [RESEND PATCH 05/10] memblock: track memblock changed at early param Jaewon Kim
     [not found]   ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p40d0ea59e8ae93f6cc89846626fea4207@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2024-05-21  2:39     ` [RESEND PATCH 06/10] memblock: recognize late freed size by checking PageReserved Jaewon Kim
     [not found]   ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p3ccda7b2d9e6518b4575427c957e19377@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2024-05-21  2:39     ` [RESEND PATCH 07/10] memblock: track kernel size on memsize Jaewon Kim
2024-05-22 19:03       ` kernel test robot
     [not found]   ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p291bbc11c4e5cdaa922ca302d95330e6b@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2024-05-21  2:39     ` [RESEND PATCH 08/10] memblock: print memsize summary information Jaewon Kim
     [not found]   ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p441a4c458d251eec7bb6e63e671c25b4e@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2024-05-21  2:39     ` [RESEND PATCH 09/10] memblock: print kernel internal size Jaewon Kim
2024-05-22 18:52       ` kernel test robot
     [not found]   ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p15a3290b675ee66339033c185a5a8c00b@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
2024-05-21  2:39     ` [RESEND PATCH 10/10] memblock: support memsize reusable to consider as reusable Jaewon Kim
2024-05-22 22:40       ` kernel test robot
     [not found]       ` <CGME20240522224129epcas1p10433785cc14bef5de93e9f26aa599ff0@epcms1p8>
2024-05-23 10:55         ` Jaewon Kim
     [not found]   ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcms1p6>
2024-05-21  2:53     ` [RESEND PATCH 00/10] memblock: introduce memsize showing reserved memory Jaewon Kim
2024-05-21  7:31       ` Mike Rapoport
     [not found]       ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcms1p5>
2024-05-21 10:17         ` Jaewon Kim
2024-05-22  8:16           ` (2) " Wei Yang
2024-05-23 14:34           ` Mike Rapoport
2024-05-24 17:33             ` Pintu Agarwal
     [not found]           ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcms1p8>
2024-05-22  8:47             ` Jaewon Kim
2024-05-23  8:55               ` Wei Yang
     [not found]               ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcms1p2>
2024-05-23  9:23                 ` 김재원
2024-05-24  9:07                 ` (2) " Jaewon Kim
2024-05-26 13:55                   ` Mike Rapoport
     [not found]                   ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcms1p7>
2024-05-27  1:30                     ` Jaewon Kim
     [not found]                     ` <20240529095119epcms1p73f0e9ff756bcb2ee6a14db459128a644@epcms1p7>
2024-05-29 11:35                       ` Wei Yang
2024-05-29 13:10                         ` Jaewon Kim
2024-05-30  0:03                           ` Wei Yang
2024-05-27  1:35                 ` Jaewon Kim
2024-05-27 16:22                   ` Mike Rapoport
2024-05-30 10:49             ` Jaewon Kim
2024-05-31  1:05               ` Wei Yang [this message]
     [not found]               ` <CGME20240521024009epcas1p10ed9f9b929203183a29f79508e79bb76@epcms1p4>
2024-05-31  8:21                 ` (2) " Jaewon Kim
2024-06-01  1:40                   ` Wei Yang
2024-06-03  9:33             ` Jaewon Kim
2024-05-22  8:20       ` Wei Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240531010551.hs67amz34mljyifw@master \
    --to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jaewon31.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=jaewon31.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pintu.ping@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tkjos@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox