From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: page type is 3, passed migratetype is 1 (nr=512)
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:28:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240529162830.GA1049743@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240528164756.GA2820@cmpxchg.org>
Thanks for the config, I was able to reproduce it with.
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:48:05PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Ah, but there DOES seem to be an issue with how we reserve
> highatomics: reserving and unreserving happens one pageblock at a
> time, but MAX_ORDER is usually bigger. If we rmqueue() an order-10
> request, reserve_highatomic_block() will only convert the first
> order-9 block in it; the tail will remain the original type, which
> will produce a buddy of mixed type blocks upon freeing.
>
> This doesn't fully explain the warning here. We'd expect to see it the
> other way round - passing an assumed type of 3 (HIGHATOMIC) for the
> remainder that is actually 1 (MOVABLE). But the pageblock-based
> reservations look fishy. I'll cook up a patch to make this
> range-based. It might just fix it in a way I'm not seeing just yet.
tl;dr: With some debugging printks, I was able to see the
issue. Should be a straight-forward fix.
No order-10 allocations are necessary. Instead, smaller allocations
grab blocks for the highatomic pool. Unreserving is lazy, so as those
allocations get freed, they have a chance to merge together. Two
adjacent highatomic blocks can merge (MAX_ORDER > pageblock_order). On
unreserve, we now have an order-10 highatomic buddy, but only clear
the type on the first order-9 pageblock. A subsequent alloc + expand
will warn about this type inconsistency.
[ 411.188518] UNRESERVE: pfn=26000 order=10
[ 411.188739] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 411.188881] 26200: page type is 3, passed migratetype is 1 (nr=512)
[ 411.189097] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 10152 at mm/page_alloc.c:645 expand+0x1c8/0x1f0
I have a draft patch to make the highatomic reservations update all
blocks inside the range, not just the first one. I'll send it out as
soon as I have tested it properly.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-27 8:58 Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-27 13:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-28 16:47 ` Johannes Weiner
2024-05-29 5:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-29 16:28 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2024-05-30 1:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2024-05-30 1:51 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-30 3:22 ` Johannes Weiner
2024-05-30 4:06 ` [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: fix highatomic typing in multi-block buddies kernel test robot
2024-05-30 11:42 ` page type is 3, passed migratetype is 1 (nr=512) Johannes Weiner
2024-05-30 14:34 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-31 13:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-05-31 5:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240529162830.GA1049743@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox